International Journal of Market Research
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
2.4
SJR
0.860
CiteScore
6.0
Categories
Business and International Management
Economics and Econometrics
Marketing
Areas
Business, Management and Accounting
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Years of issue
1996-2025
journal names
International Journal of Market Research
INT J MARKET RES
Top-3 citing journals
International Journal of Market Research
(1249 citations)

Sustainability
(331 citations)

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
(307 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of South Australia
(44 publications)

University of Strathclyde
(39 publications)

University of Portsmouth
(12 publications)

University of South Australia
(12 publications)

GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
(8 publications)

University of Portsmouth
(8 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 1369
Q1

Cosimulation-based biomechanics of the human body with hip prosthesis
Di Bona R., Catelani D., Ottaviano E., Gentile D., Testa G.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Correction to: A new skeletal model for the ankle joint complex
Rodrigues da Silva M., Marques F., Tavares da Silva M., Flores P.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

A symplectic finite element method in time for periodic response of multibody systems
Wang H., Wang C., Wang G., Pan Y., Mikkola A., Peng H.
Q1
Multibody System Dynamics
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Investigation of the dynamic transmission accuracy of an industrial robot joint RV reducer under variable situations
Xu L., Wu Y.
The dynamic transmission error of the joint RV (rotating vector) reducer is one of the important factors affecting the positioning accuracy of industrial robots. However, the current studies on the transmission accuracy characteristics of RV reducers are based on the equal speed driving condition, which neglects the impact of the transmission error generated by the joint RV reducer on the positioning accuracy when the robot is in the start-stop variable speed phase. This study carries out an in-depth analysis of the dynamic transmission accuracy characteristics of joint RV reducers of industrial robots under variable-speed working conditions. Two typical mathematical models of variable-speed drive laws are constructed, and a multibody dynamic model of the RV reducer that takes into account the geometric errors of typical components is established, aiming to more accurately simulate the operating state of the RV reducer under actual working conditions. To confirm the accuracy of the theoretical RV reducer contact dynamics model, the dynamic transmission error test of the RV reducer under equal-speed conditions is carried out. The results show that the dynamic model can better reflect the actual transmission characteristics of the RV reducer. Thereafter, based on the theoretical model, the effects of different driving laws on the dynamic transmission error of joint RV reducers are analyzed in depth. The results of the study show that the transmission error of the RV reducer under variable speed drive is significantly larger than that under equal speed drive. Moreover, angular acceleration and load inertia are the main factors affecting the transmission error of RV reducers for industrial robot joints.
Q1

Muscle path predictions using a discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange model in constrained optimisation: comparison with OpenSim and experimental data
Lavaill M., Chen X., Heinrich S., Pivonka P., Leyendecker S.
Abstract
Accurate and robust modelling of muscle paths is crucial for predicting human movement. Traditional methods often rely on simplified straight-line representations and manual specifications of via-points and wrapping surfaces, which may lead to inconsistent and unrealistic muscle paths The discrete geodesic Euler–Lagrange (DGEL) method identifies geodesics with minimal curvature trajectories that adhere closely to anatomical constraints. Embedding DGEL into an optimisation problem with a specific objective function has the potential to identify muscle paths with smooth changes in muscle length over the course of the motion, thereby avoiding abrupt muscle discontinuities. This study aims to investigate the performance of the DGEL method. We developed multibody models with increasing complexity (i.e. a static arm model, a kinematic elbow model and a kinematic shoulder model) and investigated different scenarios, such as muscle attachment modifications, simulation of diverse motions and extreme ranges of motion. We performed a comparative analysis between the geodesic model and the open-source OpenSim framework, with validation against experimental data to assess physiological plausibility. Our findings reveal that the DGEL method overcomes limitations inherent in traditional approaches, including discontinuities and incorrect wrapping surface interactions. For the static arm model, the DGEL-computed muscle length showed a closer match to ground truth compared to OpenSim. In the elbow model, the DGEL method eliminated unphysiological muscle path discontinuities. In the shoulder model, the DGEL method was validated across three different motions against experimental muscle moment arms, achieving great accuracy and superior robustness in handling complex muscle paths. This method effectively addressed common pitfalls in muscle path modelling, such as bone penetrations and erratic trajectories. Future work will further validate the DGEL method across diverse real-world applications and optimise its performance through advanced objective functions. The DGEL approach represents a significant improvement in the accuracy and robustness of muscle path modelling, advancing the field of biomechanics and musculoskeletal modelling.
Q1

Dynamic responses of a vibro-impact capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine via multibody dynamics
Wang Z., Tian J., Liu Y., Neves A., Prasad S.
Abstract
In recent years, colonic capsule endoscopy has become available in clinical practice as an alternative modality to colonoscopy. However, it faces challenges such as prolonged examination time and the absence of clinician navigation. Leveraging their pioneering work in the field of vibro-impact self-propulsion technique for gastrointestinal endoscopy, Zhang et al. (IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 8:1842–1849, 2023) developed a novel, untethered, self-propelled, endoscopic capsule robot, with the aim of providing a new means of examining bowel cancer in real time. To evaluate and optimize the passage of this capsule robot self-propelling in the large intestine, this work adopts multibody dynamics analysis and experimental investigation to study the robot’s dynamics and its interaction with the intestinal environment. Considering the complex anatomy of the large intestine, containing different sections, e.g., cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and variations of the haustra, e.g., with various radii, lengths, and heights, the robot was driven by the square-wave excitation of an inner mass interacting with the capsule body and tested on a real porcine colon. The robot’s driving parameters, including the excitation frequency, amplitude, and duty cycle, and the dimensions of the haustra are the two main factors influencing the robot’s progression in the intestine. By comparing with the experimental results, the proposed multibody dynamics model developed using MSC Adams can estimate the movement of the capsule robot and the intestinal resistance quantitatively. Extensive numerical and experimental studies suggest an excitation frequency of 60 Hz and a duty cycle of 0.4 as the optimal parameters for driving the robot, and the longer the haustral length is, the faster the robot passes through. These results ensure the validity of the proposed multibody dynamics platform, which can be used by robotic engineers for developing medical robots for intestinal examinations.
Q1

Fluid-conveying pipes in the floating frame of reference formulation
van Voorthuizen K., Abdul Rasheed M.I., Schilder J.
Abstract
This work presents a new formulation for flexible fluid-conveying pipe elements based on the widely used floating frame of reference formulation. The elements can be used as a tool for the analysis of flexible multibody systems that contain fluid-conveying pipes, as it is well known that the movement of the fluid can influence the behavior and stability of such systems. The pipe defines a control volume through which the fluid, which is considered to be a moving mass, axially flows. The velocity of a material point of the fluid is therefore a material derivative of its position, representing the large rigid movement and small elastic deformation of the pipe along with the velocity of the fluid with respect to the pipe. The equations of motion are derived through the principle of virtual work, spatial discretization by finite element interpolation functions, and model reduction. A simplification of the consistent equations of motion is proposed, which avoids the use of inertia shape integrals and reduces the effort required to implement the developed fluid-conveying pipe elements in existing multibody software. The developed elements are validated by simulation of a straight cantilevered pipe and a curved pipe constrained on one end by a hinge. A simulation of a concrete printing system illustrates the straightforward incorporation of the elements in larger multibody systems.
Q1

Dynamic modeling and simulation of the multi-point collision and contact problem of multi-legged robots
Ma X., Zhao S., An Y., Li K., Wang T.
The problem of multi-point collision and contact in multi-legged robots involves complex dynamics with multiple closed loops, variable topology, and numerous contact points, making simulations challenging. Additionally, Zeno behavior—characterized by an infinite number of discrete transitions within a finite time—is likely to occur, reducing computational efficiency and potentially causing simulations to stall. This paper establishes a linear complementary dynamic model to study the collision and contact problem of multi-legged mobile robots. For the uncertainty of multi-point collision and contact, we use sets and transformation matrices to represent the number and position changes of the points that collide or contact with the ground. This paper separately studies the problems of multi-point collision and multi-point continuous contact and considers the coupling effect of collision and continuous contact. A new criterion to determine the state of continuous contact is proposed, and modifications are made to the relevant linear complementary equations to prevent the Zeno behavior. Finally, several numerical examples are provided to verify the effectiveness of the method.
Q1

Vibration isolation performance and non-probabilistic reliability evaluation of multidimensional vibration isolator with interval joint clearance
Gao X., Niu J., He L., Wang Z., Qin Z., Wu H.
For suppressing multidimensional vibration effectively, the multidimensional vibration isolator based on parallel mechanism considering interval joint clearance is proposed. The kinematics and dynamics of the isolator are established respectively. The contact force generated due to interval joint clearance is modeled respectively by the Lankarani–Nikravesh (L-N) model and the modified Coulomb friction force model. Furthermore, the dynamics of the isolator with interval joint clearance are obtained by the first order interval perturbation method. The upper and lower bounds of vibration isolation performance are calculated, which indicates the isolator with interval joint clearance inhibited external vibration in time and frequency domain respectively. The vibration isolation performance is most sensitive in pitch (around $x$ ) direction due to the existence of interval joint clearance. The non-probabilistic reliability model of the isolator is proposed by the shortest distance method, and the non-probabilistic reliability index is investigated in each isolation direction with interval joint clearance. The reliability index of the isolator exhibits a quasi-stable area in horizontal (in $x$ ) and pitch (around $x$ ) directions, which implies the reliability index is not sensitive to joint clearance variation in a certain perturbation range. The proposed vibration isolator with interval joint clearance is fabricated, and the vibration isolation experiment is conducted. The experimental results are generally consistent with the theoretical results, which indicates the correctness of the analysis.
Q1

Using high fidelity discrete element simulation to calibrate an expeditious terramechanics model in a multibody dynamics framework
Zhang Y., Dai J., Hu W., Negrut D.
The wheel–soil interaction has great impact on the dynamics of off-road vehicles in terramechanics applications. The soil contact model (SCM), which anchors an empirical method to characterize the frictional contact between a wheel and soil, has been widely used in off-road vehicle dynamics simulations because it quickly produces adequate results for many terramechanics applications. The SCM approach calls for a set of model parameters that are obtained via a bevameter test. This test is expensive and time consuming to carry out, and in some cases difficult to set up, e.g., in extraterrestrial applications. We propose an approach to address these concerns by conducting the bevameter test in simulation, using a model that captures the physics of the actual experiment with high fidelity. To that end, we model the bevameter test rig as a multibody system, while the dynamics of the soil is captured using a discrete element model (DEM). The multibody dynamics–soil dynamics co-simulation is used to replicate the bevameter test, producing high fidelity ground truth test data that is subsequently used to calibrate the SCM parameters within a Bayesian inference framework. To test the accuracy of the resulting SCM terramechanics, we run single wheel and full rover simulations using both DEM and SCM terrains. The SCM results match well with those produced by the DEM solution, and the simulation time for SCM is two to three orders of magnitude lower than that of DEM. All simulations in this work are performed using Chrono, an open-source, publicly available simulator. The scripts and models used are available in a public repository for reproducibility studies and further research.
Q1

A machine learning approach to simulate flexible body dynamics
Slimak T., Zwölfer A., Todorov B., Rixen D.
Abstract
Flexible body dynamics simulations are powerful tools to realistically analyze vehicles, machines, mechanics, etc. However, the inherently nonlinear governing equations often require tailor-made and computationally expense solution strategies. Employing artificial neural networks for forward dynamics analyses of flexible bodies may be not only useful as a model reduction tool, since evaluating a network is frequently faster compared to solving physics-based models, but also to enhance models with experimental data. In this realm four primary strategies have emerged: (i) Incorporating time as an input to the artificial neural network to predict the desired solution variables at that specific time. (ii) Utilizing an entire time series as input, the network generates the corresponding time series of the desired solution variables in a single pass through the artificial neural network. (iii) Employing an artificial neural network to advance one time step into the future using the states as input. (iv) Leveraging the artificial neural network solely for learning the equations of motion or energetic quantities, e.g., Lagrangian/Hamiltonian, coupled with standard techniques from analytical dynamics and time integration. Approaches (iii) and (iv) can be considered advantageous owing to their inherent physics-informed nature, greater flexibility in adopting varying time steps, and ease of integration with classical simulation techniques. This contribution, therefore, presents a method to predict flexible body dynamics one step at a time using two complimentary artificial neural networks. One network predicts the equations of motion relationship between positions, velocities, and accelerations, while a second network or numerical integrator propagates the system states forwards in time. This work demonstrates the feasibility of the developed approach on the testcase of a flexible beam. Various parameter studies and alternative solutions are presented to highlight the performance of the developed approach. The robustness and ability to extrapolate are also explored to determine the practical viability of this solution. The intention of this single-body work is to enable the future embedding in a multibody context.
Q1

Embedding reference dynamics in model predictive control for trajectory tracking of multi-input multi-output non-minimum phase underactuated multibody systems
Bettega J., Richiedei D., Tamellin I.
This paper proposes a feedback control technique for path and trajectory tracking on multi-input, multi-output nonminimum phase underactuated multibody systems and applies it to a spatial gantry crane moving a double pendulum. The two links forming the double pendulum are connected in series and the desired output of the system is the tip of the second link. This output selection yields to a nonminimum phase system, which is a class of dynamical systems that are particularly challenging from the control design perspective. In this paper, an enhanced formulation of Model Predictive Control is proposed to solve the output trajectory tracking problem by embedding the dynamics of the spatial reference trajectory within the optimization process performed at each time step. The proposed control technique is formulated considering two different scenarios: the case of torque-controlled (i.e., current-controlled) actuators, and the case of position-controlled actuators. The latter is unusual in the field of MPC and is suitable for industrial applications where proprietary controllers are adopted. Numerical validations show negligible contour and tracking errors during the execution of the desired trajectories, with low computational effort.
Q1

Optimising a driving mechanism mechanical design of EXOTIC exoskeleton—a review on upper limb exoskeletons driving systems and a case study
Falkowski P., Mohammadi M., Andreasen Struijk L.N., Rzymkowski C., Pilat Z.
AbstractWhile designing rehabilitation exoskeletons is often realised based on experience and intuition, many processes can be computer-aided. This gives the opportunity to design lighter and more compact constructions. Hence, the devices can be fully wearable and have a wider range of motion. So far, mainly topology optimisation and parametric dimensional optimisations have been used for that. The presented study addresses the problem of automatic selection of the driving systems for exoskeletons. It consists of the literature review of the components used to actuate the joints of such constructions, optimisation algorithm development, and a case study on the EXOTIC exoskeleton. The method includes building a database of motors and gearboxes, computing inverse kinematics of a system to obtain angular trajectories from the task-oriented paths, iteration computing inverse dynamics to compute required torque and the search for the optimal solution according to the defined goal function. This approach enables single joint and multijoint optimisation, with the custom goal function minimising optionally masses, diameters or widths of the selected driving systems. The investigation consists of the 28 simulation trials for EXOTIC exoskeleton to compare results obtained for different aims. Moreover, to visualise the effect, the 1st DOF driving mechanism is redesigned to obtain its minimum width based on the optimisation results. The optimal choice reduced the actuation mechanism mass by 15.3%, while its total dimensions by 17.5%, 8.5% and 26.2%, respectively. The presented approach is easily transferable to any other active exoskeleton and can contribute to designing compact and lightweight constructions. This is particularly important in assistive rehabilitation and can also be used in industrial assistance processes.
Q1

Tailored gait-pattern generation and verification based on the dynamic analysis of the human musculoskeletal model
Shanmuga Prasad S., Kim Y.
This study presents a novel Forward Dynamic approach that integrates a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to generate and optimize gait patterns with Inverse Dynamics analysis, tailored to individual users in the robot-assisted training platform. The resulting trajectories provide gait-trajectory planning using the developed gait-pattern simulator, enabling medical personnel to select customized tasks and training trajectories for users based on their training goals, subsequently transferring user-specific parameters to the exoskeletal robot for rehabilitation/training. By leveraging biomechanical data as reference (joint torque and force) from the Inverse Dynamic analysis, the method foregoes the necessity for experimental data, directly predicting joint angles and positions. To ensure the validity of the proposed method, we used a combined approach of numerical analysis and comparison with motion-capture data. This evaluation aimed to assess how closely the simulated results resembled real human walking motion for the lower-extremity joints.
Q1

Multi-physics tribo-dynamics simulation of lubricated translational joints in marine engines
Li R., Li G., Meng X., Sun R., Cheng W.
Lubricated translational joints are extensively utilized in power equipment. Due to the presence of clearance, the moving mass exhibits transverse motion within the guide rail in addition to its reciprocating motion. This transverse motion significantly influences the friction, wear, and service life of the friction pair. In this process, multi-physics factors such as fluid lubrication, structural deformation, and frictional heat generation interact with each other, making the tribo-dynamics characteristics very complex. In the current study, a new thermal-fluid-solid coupled method for modeling the tribo-dynamics of translational lubricated joints is presented, and it is applied to the crosshead slider-guide friction pair in marine engines. Research results show that the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the slider predicted by the model is consistent with the experimental ones, the correctness of the model is verified. The frictional heat generation has little effect on the tribo-dynamics characteristics of the crosshead slider under the rated operating conditions. However, the structure deformation induced by the external load intensifies the transverse motion of the crosshead slider. Compared with the model that ignored the deformation, the transverse displacement can be increased by 30%, which indicates that it is necessary to consider the multi-physics coupling effect.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
|
International Journal of Market Research
1249 citations, 6.7%
|
|
Sustainability
331 citations, 1.78%
|
|
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
307 citations, 1.65%
|
|
Journal of Business Research
295 citations, 1.58%
|
|
Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services
201 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Journal of Product and Brand Management
172 citations, 0.92%
|
|
SSRN Electronic Journal
171 citations, 0.92%
|
|
Frontiers in Psychology
160 citations, 0.86%
|
|
European Journal of Marketing
143 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Behaviour
133 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Management
110 citations, 0.59%
|
|
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
102 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Marketing Intelligence and Planning
100 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Social Science Computer Review
92 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Psychology and Marketing
85 citations, 0.46%
|
|
International Journal of Consumer Studies
85 citations, 0.46%
|
|
Qualitative Market Research
84 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Journal of Brand Management
79 citations, 0.42%
|
|
PLoS ONE
79 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
78 citations, 0.42%
|
|
British Food Journal
71 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Computers in Human Behavior
70 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
70 citations, 0.38%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
69 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Journal of Bank Marketing
68 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management
64 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
63 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Tourism Management
60 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Services Marketing
59 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Industrial Marketing Management
58 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Internet Research
58 citations, 0.31%
|
|
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
58 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
58 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Cleaner Production
57 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Strategic Marketing
57 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Analytics
54 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Journal of Consumer Marketing
53 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Communications
53 citations, 0.28%
|
|
SAGE Open
53 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Food Quality and Preference
50 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Journal of Travel Research
49 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Journal of Hospitality Management
49 citations, 0.26%
|
|
International Marketing Review
47 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
46 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Australasian Marketing Journal
46 citations, 0.25%
|
|
International Journal of Advertising
45 citations, 0.24%
|
|
International Journal of Information Management
42 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Service Management
42 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Business Ethics
41 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Expert Systems with Applications
40 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Cogent Business and Management
40 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Heliyon
40 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of International Consumer Marketing
39 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Quality and Quantity
39 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Management Decision
38 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice
37 citations, 0.2%
|
|
The International Journal of Qualitative Methods
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Promotion Management
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship
35 citations, 0.19%
|
|
International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice
33 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Field Methods
32 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition)
32 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Handbook of Research on Global Business Opportunities
32 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Information and Management
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Recherche et Applications en Marketing
31 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
29 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Total Quality Management and Business Excellence
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Islamic Marketing
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Interactive Marketing
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
27 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Service Industries Journal
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
IEEE Access
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Information Technology and People
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Communications in Computer and Information Science
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Tourism Management Perspectives
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Behaviour and Information Technology
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Interactive Advertising
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
International Journal of Research in Marketing
22 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Journal of Service Theory and Practice
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Journal of Advertising
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
TQM Journal
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Remodelling Businesses for Sustainable Development
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
20 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Marketing Theory
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Product Innovation Management
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Review of Managerial Science
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Marketing Education
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Young Consumers
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
International Journal of Tourism Research
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Online Information Review
19 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Service Research
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Journal of Advertising Research
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Public Opinion Quarterly
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
|
Elsevier
2828 citations, 15.18%
|
|
Emerald
2788 citations, 14.97%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
2315 citations, 12.43%
|
|
Springer Nature
2062 citations, 11.07%
|
|
SAGE
1324 citations, 7.11%
|
|
Wiley
1121 citations, 6.02%
|
|
N T C Publications Ltd.
1084 citations, 5.82%
|
|
MDPI
791 citations, 4.25%
|
|
IGI Global
786 citations, 4.22%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
327 citations, 1.76%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
267 citations, 1.43%
|
|
Social Science Electronic Publishing
176 citations, 0.94%
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
167 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Oxford University Press
144 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
101 citations, 0.54%
|
|
JMIR Publications
92 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
91 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
71 citations, 0.38%
|
|
CAIRN
65 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
38 citations, 0.2%
|
|
World Scientific
33 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
32 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Cognizant, LLC
28 citations, 0.15%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
26 citations, 0.14%
|
|
LLC CPC Business Perspectives
25 citations, 0.13%
|
|
IOP Publishing
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
SciELO
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
AOSIS
24 citations, 0.13%
|
|
American Marketing Association
23 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
BMJ
21 citations, 0.11%
|
|
IOS Press
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Advertising Research Foundation
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Hogrefe Publishing Group
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance SSBFNET
18 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
17 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
13 citations, 0.07%
|
|
National Recreation and Park Association
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
12 citations, 0.06%
|
|
AIP Publishing
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
11 citations, 0.06%
|
|
American Accounting Association
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
South Florida Publishing LLC
10 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PeerJ
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Editura Economica
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Brazilian Administration Review
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Virtus Interpress
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Human Kinetics
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Consortium Erudit
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Intellect
9 citations, 0.05%
|
|
EDP Sciences
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
OpenEdition
8 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Academy of Pediatrics
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Annual Reviews
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IntechOpen
7 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Speech Language Hearing Association
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Behaviormetric Society of Japan
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society of Transportation and Logistics
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Fundacao Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administracao de Empresas de Sao Paulo
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Statistics Sweden
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
ASME International
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japan Society of Marketing and Distribution
6 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
5 citations, 0.03%
|
|
John Benjamins Publishing Company
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academy of Management
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Technical University Liberec
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Cheng Kung University
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Public Health Association
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
IAE School of Management Montpellier University
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
EJournal Publishing
4 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Edinburgh University Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society for Quality
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
proceedings of the vldb endowment
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Goteborg University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Gyandhara International Academic Publications
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Grupo Comunicar, Colectivo Andaluz de Educacion en Medios de Comunicacion
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Riga Technical University
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mark Allen Group
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Science Alert
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
The Korean Society for Clothing Industry
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Tech Science Press
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
SLACK
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Hans Publishers
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Publishing House Helvetica (Publications)
3 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
|
Publishing organizations
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
|
University of South Australia
44 publications, 3.29%
|
|
University of Strathclyde
39 publications, 2.92%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
12 publications, 0.9%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
11 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Massey University
10 publications, 0.75%
|
|
University of Wollongong
9 publications, 0.67%
|
|
GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
9 publications, 0.67%
|
|
University of Queensland
8 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Amsterdam
8 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Cranfield University
8 publications, 0.6%
|
|
University of Stirling
8 publications, 0.6%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
7 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
7 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Monash University
7 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Bristol
7 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Mannheim
7 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Reading
7 publications, 0.52%
|
|
University of Nottingham
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Kingston University
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Auckland
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Swinburne University of Technology
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Lingnan University
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Autonomous University of Madrid
6 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Twente
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Ghent University
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Nanyang Technological University
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Warwick
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
King's College London
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Manchester
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Glasgow
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of the West of England
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Michigan
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Sheffield
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Murcia
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University of Hull
5 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Beijing Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Copenhagen Business School
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Manchester Metropolitan University
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
National Taiwan University
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Otago
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Griffith University
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Northwestern University
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
McGill University
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Almería
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Vienna University of Economics and Business
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Salamanca
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Erasmus University Rotterdam
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Leicester
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Bath
4 publications, 0.3%
|
|
National Research University Higher School of Economics
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
COMSATS University Islamabad
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Peking University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Lisbon
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of New South Wales
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University College London
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Padua
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Maastricht University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Antwerp
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Yuan Ze University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Birmingham
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Canterbury
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Deakin University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Macquarie University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Cape Town
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Hongik University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Newcastle University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Texas at Austin
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Central Michigan University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Erlangen–Nuremberg
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Cardiff University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
NOVA University Lisbon
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Brigham Young University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Surrey
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of York
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Université du Québec à Montréal
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Bournemouth University
3 publications, 0.22%
|
|
King Saud University
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Bilkent University
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Hacettepe University
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Ege University
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Istanbul Bilgi University
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Lucknow
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Tsinghua University
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Fudan University
2 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
University of South Australia
12 publications, 5.45%
|
|
GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences
8 publications, 3.64%
|
|
University of Portsmouth
8 publications, 3.64%
|
|
University of Auckland
6 publications, 2.73%
|
|
Auckland University of Technology
5 publications, 2.27%
|
|
University of Wollongong
5 publications, 2.27%
|
|
Pompeu Fabra University
5 publications, 2.27%
|
|
University of Warwick
4 publications, 1.82%
|
|
Nottingham Trent University
4 publications, 1.82%
|
|
Charles Sturt University
4 publications, 1.82%
|
|
University of Mannheim
4 publications, 1.82%
|
|
University of Manchester
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Kingston University
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Canterbury
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Griffith University
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Kyung Hee University
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Hongik University
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Bristol
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
University of Reading
3 publications, 1.36%
|
|
Peking University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Technology Sydney
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
National Taiwan University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Glasgow
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Massey University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Queensland
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Cape Town
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Yonsei University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Keio University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Central Michigan University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
McGill University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Whitewater
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Sheffield Hallam University
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Sheffield
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of South Alabama
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
2 publications, 0.91%
|
|
King Saud University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Zayed University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Delhi
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Ozyegin University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Banaras Hindu University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
National Institute of Technology Calicut
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal's Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Istanbul Bilgi University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Lahore University of Management Sciences
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Indian Institute of Management Rohtak
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Punjabi University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Tongji University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Xi'an Jiaotong University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Anadolu University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Ghent University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Science, Malaysia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
National University of Malaysia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Monash University Malaysia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Lisbon
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Radboud University Nijmegen
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Strasbourg
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Bina Nusantara University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bayreuth
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Sapienza University of Rome
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Borås
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
National Taiwan Ocean University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of New South Wales
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Xidian University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Western Sydney University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Xiamen University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bologna
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University College London
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Dundee
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Oxford Brookes University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Bergen
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Southern Denmark
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
London School of Economics and Political Science
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Nottingham
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Queensland University of Technology
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Loughborough University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
National Ilan University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Birmingham
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Bocconi University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Free International University of Social Studies "Guido Carli"
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Maria SS. Assunta University of Rome
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Otago
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Waikato
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Melbourne
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Western Australia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of Adelaide
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Deakin University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Curtin University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Flinders University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
University of the Sunshine Coast
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Stanford University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Korea University
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.45%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishing countries
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 251, 18.77%
United Kingdom
251 publications, 18.77%
|
USA
|
USA, 176, 13.16%
USA
176 publications, 13.16%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 106, 7.93%
Australia
106 publications, 7.93%
|
China
|
China, 65, 4.86%
China
65 publications, 4.86%
|
France
|
France, 44, 3.29%
France
44 publications, 3.29%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 44, 3.29%
Spain
44 publications, 3.29%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 40, 2.99%
Germany
40 publications, 2.99%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 30, 2.24%
New Zealand
30 publications, 2.24%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 24, 1.8%
Netherlands
24 publications, 1.8%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 23, 1.72%
Canada
23 publications, 1.72%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 22, 1.65%
Italy
22 publications, 1.65%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 20, 1.5%
Republic of Korea
20 publications, 1.5%
|
India
|
India, 17, 1.27%
India
17 publications, 1.27%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 12, 0.9%
Turkey
12 publications, 0.9%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 11, 0.82%
Belgium
11 publications, 0.82%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 11, 0.82%
Singapore
11 publications, 0.82%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 11, 0.82%
South Africa
11 publications, 0.82%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 8, 0.6%
Austria
8 publications, 0.6%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 8, 0.6%
Mexico
8 publications, 0.6%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 7, 0.52%
Portugal
7 publications, 0.52%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 7, 0.52%
Switzerland
7 publications, 0.52%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 6, 0.45%
Denmark
6 publications, 0.45%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 6, 0.45%
Iran
6 publications, 0.45%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 0.45%
Pakistan
6 publications, 0.45%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 5, 0.37%
Greece
5 publications, 0.37%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.37%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.37%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 5, 0.37%
Tunisia
5 publications, 0.37%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 5, 0.37%
Sweden
5 publications, 0.37%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 4, 0.3%
Japan
4 publications, 0.3%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 3, 0.22%
Russia
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 3, 0.22%
Ireland
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Monaco
|
Monaco, 3, 0.22%
Monaco
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 3, 0.22%
Norway
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 3, 0.22%
Poland
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 3, 0.22%
Saudi Arabia
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 3, 0.22%
Chile
3 publications, 0.22%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 2, 0.15%
Argentina
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 0.15%
Brazil
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.15%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 2, 0.15%
Iraq
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 2, 0.15%
Kenya
2 publications, 0.15%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 2, 0.15%
UAE
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 2, 0.15%
Slovenia
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 2, 0.15%
Philippines
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.15%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.15%
|
Belarus
|
Belarus, 1, 0.07%
Belarus
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.07%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Azerbaijan
|
Azerbaijan, 1, 0.07%
Azerbaijan
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.07%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.07%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.07%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 1, 0.07%
Ghana
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 1, 0.07%
Israel
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.07%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 1, 0.07%
Kuwait
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.07%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.07%
Oman
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.07%
Romania
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 1, 0.07%
Finland
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 1, 0.07%
Croatia
1 publication, 0.07%
|
Show all (30 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 62, 28.18%
United Kingdom
62 publications, 28.18%
|
USA
|
USA, 48, 21.82%
USA
48 publications, 21.82%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 36, 16.36%
Australia
36 publications, 16.36%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 17, 7.73%
Germany
17 publications, 7.73%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 16, 7.27%
New Zealand
16 publications, 7.27%
|
France
|
France, 13, 5.91%
France
13 publications, 5.91%
|
China
|
China, 12, 5.45%
China
12 publications, 5.45%
|
India
|
India, 9, 4.09%
India
9 publications, 4.09%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 9, 4.09%
Republic of Korea
9 publications, 4.09%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 7, 3.18%
Spain
7 publications, 3.18%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 5, 2.27%
Canada
5 publications, 2.27%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 3, 1.36%
Italy
3 publications, 1.36%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 3, 1.36%
Malaysia
3 publications, 1.36%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 3, 1.36%
Netherlands
3 publications, 1.36%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 3, 1.36%
Pakistan
3 publications, 1.36%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 3, 1.36%
Singapore
3 publications, 1.36%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 3, 1.36%
Turkey
3 publications, 1.36%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 2, 0.91%
Greece
2 publications, 0.91%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 2, 0.91%
Indonesia
2 publications, 0.91%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 2, 0.91%
Poland
2 publications, 0.91%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 2, 0.91%
Czech Republic
2 publications, 0.91%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 2, 0.91%
Chile
2 publications, 0.91%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 2, 0.91%
Switzerland
2 publications, 0.91%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 2, 0.91%
South Africa
2 publications, 0.91%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 2, 0.91%
Japan
2 publications, 0.91%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 1, 0.45%
Estonia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 1, 0.45%
Portugal
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 1, 0.45%
Austria
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.45%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.45%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1, 0.45%
Brazil
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.45%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.45%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 1, 0.45%
Iran
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 1, 0.45%
Ireland
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 1, 0.45%
Kenya
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 1, 0.45%
Colombia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 1, 0.45%
Mexico
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 1, 0.45%
Norway
1 publication, 0.45%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 1, 0.45%
UAE
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 1, 0.45%
Romania
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.45%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 1, 0.45%
Tunisia
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 1, 0.45%
Sweden
1 publication, 0.45%
|
Show all (14 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
1 profile journal article
Burgess Steven
20 publications,
2 700 citations
h-index: 11