Open Access
Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q2
WOS
Q3
Impact factor
1.2
SJR
0.475
CiteScore
3.8
Categories
Horticulture
Genetics
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Years of issue
1974-1981, 1983-1989, 1991, 1993-2025
journal names
Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
J AM SOC HORTIC SCI
Top-3 citing journals

Scientia Horticulturae
(6061 citations)

Postharvest Biology and Technology
(3065 citations)
Top-3 organizations

University of California, Davis
(603 publications)

University of Florida
(589 publications)

Michigan State University
(413 publications)

University of Florida
(15 publications)

Michigan State University
(9 publications)

Oregon State University
(9 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 2164
Q3

Derivation of the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations from the lattice Boltzmann equation: Difference between the Chapman--Enskog expansion and the Sone expansion
Inamuro T., Suzuki K., Yoshino M.
Abstract
We derive the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations from the lattice Boltzmann equation using the Chapman--Enskog expansion and the Sone expansion and clarify the differences between the two approaches. In the Chapman--Enskog expansion, we first derive the compressible Navier—Stokes equations on the multiple time scales (the acoustic and diffusive time scales). Then the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations are derived under the conditions of low Mach number flows and small density variations on the diffusive time scale. If the acoustic time scale remains in the analysis of the derived macroscopic equations, the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations are recovered with only first-order spatial accuracy. On the other hand, in the Sone expansion we can derive the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations under the condition of low Mach number flows on the diffusive time scale. Despite some differences between the two approaches, we obtain the same result that the flow velocity and the pressure satisfy the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations with the second-order spatial accuracy in low Mach number flows on the diffusive time scale. The accuracy is verified through simulating a generalized Taylor--Green problem.
Q3

Study of the settling and interactions of a pair of two-dimensional bottom-heavy squirmers in a vertical channel
Qi T.T., Lin J., Ouyang Z.
Abstract
In this study, the squirmer model with a prescribed tangential velocity is used as a model for swimming microorganisms where its geometric center is offset from the center of mass (bottom-heavy). The settling behavior and interactions of two bottom-heavy squirmers in a vertical channel are simulated numerically under low Reynolds number. Five settling modes, i.e. stable vertical settling, stable inclined settling, wall-attracting oscillatory, oscillatory, and chaotic motion are identified. In addition to the swimming Reynolds number Re
s [0.1,1.0], density ratio γ [1.1,2.1], and swimming strength β [−7,7], another bottom-heavy parameter ER (the ratio of the distance from the center of mass to the geometric center relative to the radius, in the range of [0a
0,0.75a
0] is introduced. The effects of these parameters on the settling modes of bottom-heavy squirmers, terminal Reynolds number Re
t, and interactions of the two bottom-heavy squirmers are discussed. The results showed that a pair of neutral bottom-heavy squirmers more easily achieved a stable structure at the channel center. In contrast, a pair of bottom-heavy pushers were more likely to be captured by the channel walls, leading to a stable structure near the walls. The stable symmetric structure of a pair of bottom-heavy pullers was disturbed, resulting in turbulence. Increasing the swimming strength β accelerates the settling of a pair of pushers. For different ER, the settling speed of two bottom-heavy pushers is greater than that of two bottom-heavy pullers. Additionally, the difference in settling speed between two bottom-heavy squirmers becomes more pronounced with an increase in Re
s. As γ increases, the settling behavior of bottom-heavy squirmers with high β differs from that of those with low β. Moreover, Re
t of a pair of pushers gradually approaches that of neutral bottom-heavy squirmers.
Q3

Numerical study of transition in lid-driven flow in cavities with a semicircular round bottom
Pan T., Li A., Chiu S.
Abstract
In this article, three-dimensional lid-driven flows in cavities with a semicircular round bottom are studied. We have first focused on lid-driven flow in a semicircular cavity with a unit square moving lid and height 1/2. The critical Reynolds number
R
e
cr
for the transition from steady flow to unsteady one has been obtained. Based on the averaged velocity field in one cycle of fluid flow motion, the flow difference between the averaged one and velocity field, called oscillation mode, at several time instances in such cycle shows an almost identical pattern for several Reynolds numbers close to
R
e
cr
. This similarity indicates the oscillation mode associated with the Hopf bifurcation originated at Re less than
R
e
cr
. For lid-driven flow in a cavity with a semicircular round bottom and height one, its oscillation mode shows a periodic change of local secondary flows associated with Hopf bifurcation and pairs of Taylor–Görtler-like vortices are obtained.
Q3

A Darcy-Forchheimer Fluid Model with Fuzzy Norms in Variable Exponent Sequence Spaces
Díaz J.L.
Abstract
The Darcy-Forchheimer model extends Darcy's law to account for nonlinear inertial effects in fluid dynamics. This paper integrates fuzzy logic and variable exponent sequence spaces into the model to address the inherent uncertainties and heterogeneities in porous media. Through Fredholm operator theory and fixed-point theorems, we establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the nonlinear system. Numerical investigations highlight the impact of varying porous media conditions on fluid behavior. As a main outcome, we observe that solutions exhibit a smooth behaviour for moderate levels of permeability and porosity in the media, while for increased fuzzy norms in both media properties, the fluid velocity profile exhibits fluctuations due to the influence of the fuzzy terms.
Q3

Application of physics-informed neural networks for thin liquid film flows
Han Q., Sun X., Zhang F., Shao S., Ma C.
Abstract
The flow of a film induced by gravity is not only widespread in nature but also has significant applications in various industrial
technologies such as coating techniques, nanotechnology, microfluidic chips, and heat exchangers. The film exhibits various nonlinear dynamic phenomena due to the interactions between surface tension, gravity, and other forces, making the study of this type of flow of great importance. However, the theoretical derivation of thin film fluid dynamics is complex, with diverse working conditions, making numerical solutions difficult, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. Therefore, it is of significant importance to seek an approach that differs from theoretical derivation or numerical solutions for the study of thin film fluid dynamics. With the rapid development of deep learning, this paper employs physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) algorithm, in conjunction with the partial differential equation (PDE) governing the fluid film thickness, to conduct research on forward prediction of the film thickness variation over time and space, and inverse problem solving to determine unknown parameters in the governing equation from data. The study investigates the governing equation for the thickness of a falling film along an inclined plane and applies the PINN method to solve it. The research predicted the film thickness for three different characteristic waveforms and conducted a comparative analysis with solutions obtained using the commercial software COMSOL. Additionally, the unknown parameters in the governing equation were inversely solved using limited data, and the differences in prediction results with and without noisy data were compared.
Q3

Bioconvection in an anisotropic scattering suspension of phototactic algae exposed to diffused sunlight
Rajput S.K., Panda M.K.
Abstract
The onset of phototaxis-driven bioconvection in an anisotropic (forward) scattering algal suspension illuminated from above by diffuse/scattered sunlight is investigated in the proposed work. Linear stability analysis is performed to investigate the onset of bioconvection in the proposed study and the resulting eigenvalue problem is solved using a fourth-order accurate, finite-difference scheme based on the Newton Raphson Kantorovich iteration. The study demonstrates that forward scattering enhances suspension stability, energy transfer to deeper regions resulting significant biomass contribution and variation in it allows the bioconvective solution to shift from mode 1 to mode 2 at fluid dynamic instability. Moreover, the bioconvective flow patterns of the proposed model via perturbed algal concentration are implicated in key ecological phenomena, including blooms. The findings of this study show some resemblance to gyrotactic bioconvection via dismissal of the collimated beam. Furthermore, the outcomes of the proposed work include evidence of some interesting phenomena, such as the existence of limit cycles (and/or orbits) via bifurcation analysis.
Q3

Effect of permeability on the interaction between two spheres translating through a couple stress fluid
Alotaibi M.A., El-Sapa S.
Abstract
This article explores the steady and uniform motion of two spherical particles submerged in an infinite fluid with Brinkman-couple stress properties, where the particles are entirely immersed and surface slippage is disregarded. While the particles may vary in size, they are composed of the same material and move along the line that connects their centers, influenced by different velocities or external forces. The analysis is performed under low Reynolds number conditions, which signify laminar flow dominated by viscous forces. Using boundary collocation methods, semi-analytical solutions to the governing differential equations are derived, facilitating a thorough investigation of the system. The study employs normalized drag force to evaluate the effects of particle interactions, presenting calculated values graphically and discussing them with several key factors, such as particle size and separation distance, thereby enhancing the understanding of particle dynamics in complex fluid environments. The analysis of how varying the permeability parameter affects flow patterns around two spheres in a couple of stress fluids is shown.
Q3

Effects of pivot point and spacing on the aerodynamic characteristics of tilting biplane airfoils
Guo R., Pei X., Bai Y.
Abstract
The effects of pivot location (
x
p
/
c
) and spacing ratio (
λ
=
d
s
/
c
) on enhancing the lift generated by rigid biplane NACA 0012 airfoils at
R
e
=
1.35
×
10
5
are studied through the numerical method. SST
k
−
ω
turbulence model is adopted to solve URANS equations with overset grids. Results reveal that
C
L
hysteresis exist phase lag under five fixed pivot locations
x
p
/
c
=
0
, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 when biplane airfoils tilt just like pitching stroke.
C
M
curves drop regularly as the pivot point moves towards the spacing direction. However, λ decreasing plays a important role in aerodynamics:
C
L
,
lower
curve family significantly collapse and
C
L
,
upper
hysteresis rise overall owing to intensified low-pressure distribution in the gap. Additionally, these performances can be explained from the view of vorticity evolution, particularly, high angles of attack around the stall induce violent turbulence structures. With rearward movement of the pivot point, resemble vortex details appear in the further upstream, indicating aerodynamic characteristics have high similarity under different
x
p
/
c
regardless of λ. And thus a concept of effective angle of attack for biplane airfoils is proposed where a new factor λ must be introduced. Data assimilation results and vorticity contours are exhibited to prove the feasibility of
α
eff
.
Q3

Particle spacing and stability of initially staggered deformable particle trains migrating in a channel
Xu C., Huang L., Li Y., Wang R., Shao C., Zhu Z.
Abstract
We investigated the inertial migration of deformable particles in a two-dimensional channel flow. This study analyzes the effects of the channel Reynolds number (Re), channel blockage ratio (k), particle number (Np
) and reduced bending modulus (Eb
) on the formation of staggered particle trains. The results show that the stable normalized distance
d
p
e
q
/
H
between two staggered particles is influenced by Re, k and Eb
, where H is the channel width. As k increases or Eb
decreases,
d
p
e
q
/
H
decreases. The value of
d
p
e
q
/
H
initially increases and then decreases with the increase of Re; when Eb
is large and k is small,
d
p
e
q
/
H
continuously increases with increasing Re. With the increase of Np
, the closely arranged staggered particle trains evolve into five distinct migration Regimes. We explain the conditions for the formation of each Regime and explore the mechanisms of their interconversion. The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of the self-organization process of deformable particles in channel flow.
Q3

The 17th FDR prize
Kawahara G.
Abstract
An analytic solution of Navier–Stokes flow past a sphere in the region of intermediate Reynolds number
Q3

The fall of an ellipse in a stratified fluid
Hurlen E., Llewellyn Smith S.
Abstract
The free fall of an ellipse in an infinite linearly-stratified fluid is investigated using a linear two-dimensional, Boussinesq, diffusionless, inviscid model. The oscillations of the ellipse decay because of radiation damping, but unlike the case of a circular cylinder, the ellipse can also rotate and move horizontally. The resulting equations are solved analytically for some simple cases, for which there is little or no rotation. Motions with rotation are studied numerically using a spectral method to solve for the wave field in the fluid.
Q3

Linear control of lift in dragonfly vertical flight
Kaixuan Z., Su X., Zhao Y.
Abstract
The lift generation mechanisms of dragonflies have been extensively and deeply studied. As research advances, controlling the lift coefficient faces significant challenges. How the lift coefficient varies and whether a unified model can predict lift tendency remains unresolved. In this study, we propose a flapping amplitude partial advanced model (FAPAM) to control the linear variation of lift in dragonfly vertical flight. The FAPAM model can predict the average lift coefficient by the spatial plane and control the dragonfly lift coefficient over a large range. In this model, the maximum lift coefficient is 2.01 times higher than the weight of a dragonfly. The control parameters of the FAPAM are flapping amplitude (FA) and partial lead percent (PLP). Any linear combination of FA and PLP ensures a linear variation of the average lift coefficient. When FA and advanced rotation angle (ARA) increase by one degree, respectively, the increased lift coefficient of FA is 5.38~9.52 times higher than that of ARA, which is closely related to the leading-edge vortex, trailing-edge vortex, and positive pressure zone. The FAPAM model seamlessly integrates vertical ascending mode and vertical climbing mode by introducing transition mode. Additionally, FAPAM can effectively simulate the lift coefficient required for the vertical undulating motion of dragonflies during their oviposition process on water. Most importantly, the FAPAM model can maximize the energy efficiency of different motion modes.
Q3

Statistical equilibria of two-dimensional turbulent flows for generic initial vorticity fields on a sphere, calculated on the basis of the original Miller-Robert-Sommeria theory
Ryono K., Ishioka K.
Abstract
Based on the original Miller-Robert-Sommeria theory, we explicitly compute a statistical equilibrium of two-dimensional turbulent flow on a sphere for a generic initial vorticity field introduced in a previous study. The macroscopic vorticity field corresponding to the obtained statistical equilibrium has a quadrupole structure. The resulting quadrupole structure is topologically consistent with the final state of the long-term time integration of the vorticity equation. However, the statistical equilibrium does not predict the formation of concentrated vortices as seen in the time integration. We also calculate statistical equilibria for the initial vorticity field with a planetary vorticity term, and find a change of statistical equilibria from quadrupole states to zonally symmetric states as the angular velocity of the sphere increases. The quadrupole statistical equilibria show nearly linear relations between the macroscopic vorticity and the macroscopic stream function, implying that higher-order Casimir invariants are virtually ineffective even when all Casimir invariants are considered. The discrepancy between the equilibria and the time integration results emphasizes the importance of mixing barriers, which prevent the relaxation of the evolving vorticity field to the statistical equilibria and allow the point-vortex-like dynamics of coherent vortices to persist.
Q3

Impact of Maxwell-Cattaneo effect on thermal convection instability in vertical porous layer saturated with an Oldroyd-B fluid
Jia B., Jian Y.
Abstract
The investigation focuses on the Maxwell–Cattaneo (MC) effect on the thermal convection instability in a vertical porous layer saturated with an Oldroyd-B fluid. The MC effect modifies the conventional Fourier’s law for temperature by incorporating the upper convective Oldroyd derivative. The flow through the porous layer is modeled by the Darcy‒Oldroyd model. Using the Chebyshev collocation method addresses an Orr-Sommerfeld eigenvalue problem. Analysis of temporal growth rates reveals that the MC effect causes the originally stable flow to become unstable. Furthermore, the study finds double impacts of the MC effect on convection instability depending on whether it is primarily influenced by the fluid or the solid phase. Neutral stability curves highlight a critical threshold for the averaged Cattaneo number (Ca
) of both solid and fluid. When Ca
falls below this critical value, instability is suppressed, but when it exceeds this value, instability is magnified. The analysis also reveals that viscoelasticity parameters can impact the system by either stabilizing or destabilizing it. A rise in the retardation time parameter (λ
2) exerts a stabilizing influence, whereas an increase in the relaxation time parameter (λ
1) exhibits a destabilizing effect.
Q3

Predictive Model and Optimization of Micromixers Geometry using Gaussian Process with Uncertainty Quantification and Genetic Algorithm
Maionchi D., Coimbra N.D., da Silva J.G., Santos F.
Abstract
Microfluidic devices are increasingly valuable for their compact size and ability to handle tiny fluid volumes, making efficient mixing at this scale (micromixing) a critical focus. This research aims to optimize micromixer geometries to improve mixing efficiency while controlling pressure drop, providing a method that balances performance and computational cost. Building on previous work, we introduce a novel optimization framework in microfluidics combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and machine learning (ML) techniques, particularly Gaussian process (GP) modeling with Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimization. Inspired by a Y-type micromixer design with cylindrical grooves on the main channel’s surface and internal obstructions, our study examines the impact of circular obstructions on mixing percentage and pressure drop under varying obstruction diameter and offset. Simulations conducted using OpenFOAM software generate data for a reduced-order GP model, which provides model uncertainty. The geometry is then optimized using the GA algorithm on the reduced model. Results indicate that medium-sized obstructions (137 mm diameter, 10 mm offset) near the channel wall achieve optimal mixing and pressure performance, closely aligning with previous studies. The uncertainties, recorded as 3.9% and 21.5% for mixing percentage and pressure drop, respectively, further validate the robustness of our model. This study highlights an effective, uncertainty-quantified optimization process that leverages CFD and ML integration, setting a foundation for efficient microfluidic design strategies.
Top-100
Citing journals
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
|
Scientia Horticulturae
6061 citations, 6.29%
|
|
Postharvest Biology and Technology
3065 citations, 3.18%
|
|
Hortscience: A Publication of the American Society for Hortcultural Science
3054 citations, 3.17%
|
|
Acta Horticulturae
2921 citations, 3.03%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
2240 citations, 2.33%
|
|
Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
1669 citations, 1.73%
|
|
Plants
1332 citations, 1.38%
|
|
Agronomy
1271 citations, 1.32%
|
|
Horticulturae
1133 citations, 1.18%
|
|
Euphytica
851 citations, 0.88%
|
|
PLoS ONE
825 citations, 0.86%
|
|
Journal of Plant Nutrition
801 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Engei Gakkai zasshi
781 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
776 citations, 0.81%
|
|
Agricultural Water Management
754 citations, 0.78%
|
|
HortTechnology
754 citations, 0.78%
|
|
Crop Science
744 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Theoretical And Applied Genetics
739 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Journal of Experimental Botany
648 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Physiologia Plantarum
644 citations, 0.67%
|
|
Food Chemistry
625 citations, 0.65%
|
|
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution
611 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Tree Genetics and Genomes
607 citations, 0.63%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
601 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
586 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Plant Science
552 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
532 citations, 0.55%
|
|
BMC Plant Biology
506 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Scientific Reports
501 citations, 0.52%
|
|
Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology
491 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Environmental and Experimental Botany
478 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Horticulture Research
460 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Plant Physiology
431 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Horticultural Research (Japan)
431 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture
398 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Molecular Breeding
397 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Plant Breeding
380 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Journal of Food Science
371 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
367 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Agriculture (Switzerland)
351 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Planta
346 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Plant Disease
346 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Korean Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology
327 citations, 0.34%
|
|
New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science
324 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Horticulture Journal
318 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation
314 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
288 citations, 0.3%
|
|
International Journal of Fruit Science
284 citations, 0.29%
|
|
In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant
282 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Trees - Structure and Function
282 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura
280 citations, 0.29%
|
|
LWT - Food Science and Technology
276 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Tree Physiology
269 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Plant, Cell and Environment
269 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Biologia Plantarum
269 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Plant Cell Reports
266 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science
265 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Annals of Botany
264 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Irrigation Science
261 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Plant Growth Regulation
260 citations, 0.27%
|
|
New Phytologist
256 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Molecules
248 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Erwerbs-Obstbau
248 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Photosynthetica
246 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Foods
244 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Phytopathology
244 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Plant and Soil
238 citations, 0.25%
|
|
BMC Genomics
237 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Plant Physiology
235 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Canadian Journal of Plant Science
233 citations, 0.24%
|
|
American Journal of Botany
226 citations, 0.23%
|
|
South African Journal of Botany
225 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Functional Plant Biology
215 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
212 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Horticultura Brasileira
210 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
209 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Industrial Crops and Products
194 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Crop Protection
187 citations, 0.19%
|
|
European Journal of Agronomy
181 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Genome
180 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Annals of Applied Biology
176 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Compendium of Plant Genomes
174 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
173 citations, 0.18%
|
|
European Journal of Horticultural Science
173 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Food Research International
173 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Forests
168 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Sustainability
167 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
165 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Fruits
162 citations, 0.17%
|
|
European Journal of Plant Pathology
161 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
159 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Agronomy Journal
159 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Phytochemistry
156 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Horticultural Science
154 citations, 0.16%
|
|
American Journal of Potato Research
153 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Weed Science
150 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Food Science and Technology
150 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
147 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Genes
146 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
145 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
|
Citing publishers
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
|
Elsevier
20933 citations, 21.73%
|
|
Springer Nature
15741 citations, 16.34%
|
|
Wiley
7935 citations, 8.24%
|
|
MDPI
6942 citations, 7.21%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
5609 citations, 5.82%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
4560 citations, 4.73%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
2978 citations, 3.09%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2611 citations, 2.71%
|
|
Oxford University Press
2051 citations, 2.13%
|
|
Japanese Society for Horticultural Science
1879 citations, 1.95%
|
|
SciELO
1407 citations, 1.46%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
865 citations, 0.9%
|
|
Crop Science Society of America
842 citations, 0.87%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
763 citations, 0.79%
|
|
Scientific Societies
695 citations, 0.72%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
685 citations, 0.71%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
526 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
415 citations, 0.43%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
399 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
384 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Korean Society of Horticultural Science
341 citations, 0.35%
|
|
EDP Sciences
280 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
276 citations, 0.29%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
240 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Japanese Society of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Engineers and Scientists (JASBEES)
223 citations, 0.23%
|
|
SAGE
204 citations, 0.21%
|
|
IOP Publishing
189 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
181 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Verlag Eugen Ulmer
171 citations, 0.18%
|
|
160 citations, 0.17%
|
|
IntechOpen
158 citations, 0.16%
|
|
152 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz
150 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Science Alert
137 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PeerJ
129 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Asian Network for Scientific Information
124 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Institute of Experimental Botany
119 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Annual Reviews
117 citations, 0.12%
|
|
117 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Soil Science Society of America
114 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
99 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Japanese Society of Breeding
97 citations, 0.1%
|
|
The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control
93 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria
91 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
90 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Entomological Society of America
86 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
84 citations, 0.09%
|
|
King Saud University
82 citations, 0.09%
|
|
IOS Press
78 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Plant Management Network
73 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japanese Society for Plant Cell and Molecular Biology
72 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
67 citations, 0.07%
|
|
65 citations, 0.07%
|
|
National Research Council Canada
65 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Horticultural Research Institute
62 citations, 0.06%
|
|
University of Chicago Press
58 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Northeast Forestry University
58 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
58 citations, 0.06%
|
|
SAE International
56 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)
47 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Instituto de Tecnologia do Parana
47 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
46 citations, 0.05%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
43 citations, 0.04%
|
|
FSBSI All-Russian Scientfic Research Institute of Vegetable Breeding and Seed Production
41 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences
41 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
40 citations, 0.04%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
39 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology
39 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
38 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Fundacao de Pesquisas Cientificas de Ribeirao Preto
38 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Korean Society for Plant Biotechnology
35 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korean Society of Plant Biotechnology
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Universidade Federal da Paraiba, Centro de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Departamento de Engenharia Agricola
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
The Society of Agricultural Meteorology of Japan
31 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of California Press
30 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Genetica
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
29 citations, 0.03%
|
|
28 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution All-Russian Horticultural Institute for Breeding Agrotechnology and Nursery
28 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Breeding Science
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Plant Pathology
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Herbicidas e Ervas Daninhas
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
IGI Global
27 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
26 citations, 0.03%
|
|
FSBSI FRC N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources
26 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Preservation
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Academic Journals
24 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Copernicus
23 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Faculty of Agriculture, Ain-Shams University
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Gabonatermesztesi Kutato Kozhasznu Tarsasag/Cereal Research Non-Profit Company
21 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Zhejiang University Press
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Ministry of Agriculture
20 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Emerald
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos
19 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
|
Publishing organizations
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
|
University of California, Davis
603 publications, 6.85%
|
|
University of Florida
589 publications, 6.69%
|
|
Michigan State University
413 publications, 4.69%
|
|
North Carolina State University
332 publications, 3.77%
|
|
Cornell University
307 publications, 3.49%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
266 publications, 3.02%
|
|
Oregon State University
248 publications, 2.82%
|
|
Purdue University
184 publications, 2.09%
|
|
University of Minnesota
180 publications, 2.05%
|
|
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
173 publications, 1.97%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
172 publications, 1.95%
|
|
Washington State University
170 publications, 1.93%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
165 publications, 1.88%
|
|
Israel Agricultural Research Organization
158 publications, 1.8%
|
|
Texas A&M University
142 publications, 1.61%
|
|
Virginia Tech
137 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
98 publications, 1.11%
|
|
Ohio State University
95 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Maryland, College Park
95 publications, 1.08%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
84 publications, 0.95%
|
|
University of Guelph
82 publications, 0.93%
|
|
Clemson University
81 publications, 0.92%
|
|
University of Kentucky
72 publications, 0.82%
|
|
University of Geneva
71 publications, 0.81%
|
|
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
66 publications, 0.75%
|
|
Colorado State University
62 publications, 0.7%
|
|
University of Arizona
59 publications, 0.67%
|
|
Utah State University
57 publications, 0.65%
|
|
Kansas State University
55 publications, 0.63%
|
|
Iowa State University
50 publications, 0.57%
|
|
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
47 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Auburn University
44 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University of Tennessee
42 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
35 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Louisiana State University
34 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of New Hampshire
33 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
29 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Beijing Forestry University
28 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of British Columbia
28 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
24 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Université Laval
22 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Kyoto University
21 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Stellenbosch University
20 publications, 0.23%
|
|
West Virginia University
20 publications, 0.23%
|
|
McGill University
20 publications, 0.23%
|
|
National Taiwan University
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
University of Delaware
18 publications, 0.2%
|
|
Massey University
16 publications, 0.18%
|
|
Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
16 publications, 0.18%
|
|
North Dakota State University
14 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Nagoya University
14 publications, 0.16%
|
|
Mississippi State University
14 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Rhode Island
14 publications, 0.16%
|
|
University of Connecticut
13 publications, 0.15%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
12 publications, 0.14%
|
|
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
12 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of California, Los Angeles
12 publications, 0.14%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
11 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Northeast Agricultural University
11 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization
11 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
11 publications, 0.13%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
10 publications, 0.11%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
10 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Tennessee State University
10 publications, 0.11%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
9 publications, 0.1%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
9 publications, 0.1%
|
|
University of California, Berkeley
9 publications, 0.1%
|
|
University of Ljubljana
9 publications, 0.1%
|
|
Zhejiang University
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
China Agricultural University
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Plant and Food Research
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Miyazaki
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
8 publications, 0.09%
|
|
University of Helsinki
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Southwest University
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Anhui Agricultural University
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Pisa
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Adelaide
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Okayama University
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Tottori University
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Institute for Sustainable Agriculture
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
7 publications, 0.08%
|
|
Bursa Uludağ University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Central South University of Forestry and Technology
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Kasetsart University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Zhejiang A&F University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Hokkaido University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Chiba University
6 publications, 0.07%
|
|
University of Bologna
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
University of Catania
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Lincoln University
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Hainan University
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Public University of Navarre
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Baylor College of Medicine
5 publications, 0.06%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
University of Florida
15 publications, 7.81%
|
|
Michigan State University
9 publications, 4.69%
|
|
Oregon State University
9 publications, 4.69%
|
|
University of Wisconsin–Madison
9 publications, 4.69%
|
|
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
8 publications, 4.17%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
7 publications, 3.65%
|
|
Cornell University
7 publications, 3.65%
|
|
North Carolina State University
4 publications, 2.08%
|
|
Colorado State University
4 publications, 2.08%
|
|
University of Minnesota
4 publications, 2.08%
|
|
Hebei University of Engineering
3 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Anhui Agricultural University
3 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Kaili University
3 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
3 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Hainan University
3 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Texas A&M University
3 publications, 1.56%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Beijing Forestry University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Shihezi University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Shanxi Datong University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Northeast Agricultural University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Guizhou University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Washington State University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Ohio State University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of California, Davis
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Yunnan Agricultural University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Purdue University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
High Point University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Delaware
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Utah State University
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
University of Connecticut
2 publications, 1.04%
|
|
Beijing Normal University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Lund University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Southwest University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Hebei Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Jiaxing University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Aarhus University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Chengdu Medical College
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
National Taiwan University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
West Anhui University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Fujian University of Technology
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Northwest University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Anhui University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
North Dakota State University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Ludong University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Shandong Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Pennsylvania State University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Iowa State University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Konkuk University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Zhejiang A&F University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Clemson University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Chonnam National University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of California, Riverside
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Jiaxing Vocational and Technical College
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Henan Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Henan Institute of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Luoyang Normal University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Kunming University of Science and Technology
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Kunming University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Nanchang Institute of Technology
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Sanya University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Qinghai University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Guangxi University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Leibniz University Hannover
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Xinjiang Agricultural University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Ningxia University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of British Columbia
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of Minnesota Waseca
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Meiji University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of Miyazaki
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Iwate University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Institute for Plant Molecular & Cellular Biology
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of Saskatchewan
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of Reading
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
University of Guelph
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Mississippi State University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
AgroParisTech
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Assiut University
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute
1 publication, 0.52%
|
|
Show all (64 more) | |
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
Publishing countries
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
|
USA
|
USA, 5640, 64.1%
USA
5640 publications, 64.1%
|
China
|
China, 369, 4.19%
China
369 publications, 4.19%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 334, 3.8%
Canada
334 publications, 3.8%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 218, 2.48%
Israel
218 publications, 2.48%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 152, 1.73%
Georgia
152 publications, 1.73%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 141, 1.6%
Japan
141 publications, 1.6%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 126, 1.43%
Spain
126 publications, 1.43%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 83, 0.94%
New Zealand
83 publications, 0.94%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 80, 0.91%
Australia
80 publications, 0.91%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 67, 0.76%
Italy
67 publications, 0.76%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 57, 0.65%
Switzerland
57 publications, 0.65%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 44, 0.5%
Germany
44 publications, 0.5%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 43, 0.49%
Brazil
43 publications, 0.49%
|
France
|
France, 37, 0.42%
France
37 publications, 0.42%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 31, 0.35%
United Kingdom
31 publications, 0.35%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 31, 0.35%
Mexico
31 publications, 0.35%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 31, 0.35%
South Africa
31 publications, 0.35%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 30, 0.34%
Republic of Korea
30 publications, 0.34%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 28, 0.32%
Netherlands
28 publications, 0.32%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 22, 0.25%
Turkey
22 publications, 0.25%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 20, 0.23%
Chile
20 publications, 0.23%
|
Puerto Rico
|
Puerto Rico, 17, 0.19%
Puerto Rico
17 publications, 0.19%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 15, 0.17%
Egypt
15 publications, 0.17%
|
India
|
India, 15, 0.17%
India
15 publications, 0.17%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 15, 0.17%
Poland
15 publications, 0.17%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 15, 0.17%
Thailand
15 publications, 0.17%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 14, 0.16%
Slovenia
14 publications, 0.16%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 13, 0.15%
Denmark
13 publications, 0.15%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 12, 0.14%
Belgium
12 publications, 0.14%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 12, 0.14%
Iran
12 publications, 0.14%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 10, 0.11%
Argentina
10 publications, 0.11%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 9, 0.1%
Finland
9 publications, 0.1%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 8, 0.09%
Greece
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 7, 0.08%
Colombia
7 publications, 0.08%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 6, 0.07%
Portugal
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 6, 0.07%
Nigeria
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 6, 0.07%
Norway
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 6, 0.07%
Pakistan
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 6, 0.07%
Uganda
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 5, 0.06%
Austria
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Guam
|
Guam, 5, 0.06%
Guam
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 5, 0.06%
Indonesia
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 5, 0.06%
Kenya
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 5, 0.06%
Malaysia
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 5, 0.06%
Peru
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 5, 0.06%
Philippines
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 5, 0.06%
Czech Republic
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 4, 0.05%
Iraq
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 4, 0.05%
Costa Rica
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 4, 0.05%
Morocco
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Trinidad and Tobago
|
Trinidad and Tobago, 4, 0.05%
Trinidad and Tobago
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 4, 0.05%
Ecuador
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Dominican Republic
|
Dominican Republic, 3, 0.03%
Dominican Republic
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.03%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 3, 0.03%
Cyprus
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Syria
|
Syria, 3, 0.03%
Syria
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 3, 0.03%
Tanzania
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 3, 0.03%
Sweden
3 publications, 0.03%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 2, 0.02%
Russia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 2, 0.02%
Hungary
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 2, 0.02%
Venezuela
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 2, 0.02%
Ghana
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Guatemala
|
Guatemala, 2, 0.02%
Guatemala
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 2, 0.02%
Ireland
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Senegal
|
Senegal, 2, 0.02%
Senegal
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 2, 0.02%
Serbia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 2, 0.02%
Slovakia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 2, 0.02%
Tunisia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 2, 0.02%
Croatia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 2, 0.02%
Sri Lanka
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 1, 0.01%
Kazakhstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 1, 0.01%
Ukraine
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 1, 0.01%
Algeria
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 1, 0.01%
Bangladesh
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Barbados
|
Barbados, 1, 0.01%
Barbados
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 1, 0.01%
Bulgaria
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 1, 0.01%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 1, 0.01%
Vietnam
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 1, 0.01%
Honduras
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 1, 0.01%
Jordan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 1, 0.01%
Cameroon
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.01%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.01%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 1, 0.01%
Cuba
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 1, 0.01%
Lebanon
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 1, 0.01%
Lithuania
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Luxembourg
|
Luxembourg, 1, 0.01%
Luxembourg
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 1, 0.01%
Malawi
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.01%
Oman
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 1, 0.01%
Saudi Arabia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 1, 0.01%
North Macedonia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 1, 0.01%
Singapore
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 1, 0.01%
Sudan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.01%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 1, 0.01%
Jamaica
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (65 more) | |
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
USA
|
USA, 93, 48.44%
USA
93 publications, 48.44%
|
China
|
China, 67, 34.9%
China
67 publications, 34.9%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 5, 2.6%
Japan
5 publications, 2.6%
|
France
|
France, 3, 1.56%
France
3 publications, 1.56%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 2, 1.04%
Brazil
2 publications, 1.04%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 2, 1.04%
Georgia
2 publications, 1.04%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 2, 1.04%
Egypt
2 publications, 1.04%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 2, 1.04%
Canada
2 publications, 1.04%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 1.04%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 1.04%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 2, 1.04%
Sweden
2 publications, 1.04%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 1, 0.52%
Germany
1 publication, 0.52%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 1, 0.52%
Belgium
1 publication, 0.52%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 1, 0.52%
United Kingdom
1 publication, 0.52%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 1, 0.52%
Hungary
1 publication, 0.52%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 1, 0.52%
Denmark
1 publication, 0.52%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1, 0.52%
Spain
1 publication, 0.52%
|
Tanzania
|
Tanzania, 1, 0.52%
Tanzania
1 publication, 0.52%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 1, 0.52%
Uganda
1 publication, 0.52%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 1, 0.52%
Uruguay
1 publication, 0.52%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
1 profile journal article
Eric Xu H
PhD

Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences
702 publications,
19 346 citations
h-index: 68
1 profile journal article
Amilcar Duarte
🥼
33 publications,
249 citations
h-index: 10