Open Access
LWT - Food Science and Technology
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q1
WOS
Q1
Impact factor
6
SJR
1.313
CiteScore
11.8
Categories
Food Science
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Years of issue
1973, 1984-1989, 1991-2025
journal names
LWT
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT-FOOD SCI TECHNOL
Top-3 citing journals

LWT - Food Science and Technology
(28450 citations)

Foods
(24926 citations)

Food Chemistry
(23163 citations)
Top-3 organizations

Jiangnan University
(408 publications)

Universidade Estadual de Campinas
(232 publications)

South China University of Technology
(196 publications)

Jiangnan University
(245 publications)

Northeast Agricultural University
(155 publications)

Northwest University
(115 publications)
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 8233
Q1

Central Executive Network drives delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced nonlinear changes in large-scale functional connectivity in adolescent nonhuman primates
Byun A.J., Deshpande H.U., Stover J., Kangas B.D., Kohut S.J.
Q1
Neuropsychopharmacology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

A new module in the drug development process: preclinical multi-center randomized controlled trial of R-ketamine on alcohol relapse
Meinhardt M.W., Skorodumov I., Jeanblanc J., Benvenuti F., Hilal F.F., Domi E., André C., Bodeau S., Jeanblanc V., Domanegg K., Ciccocioppo R., Naassila M., Spanagel R.
Abstract
The drug development process in psychiatry faces significant challenges due to low reproducibility rates in animal testing, which often leads to translation failures. To address this issue, we introduce a new approach in psychiatric drug development: a preclinical randomized controlled trial (preRCT). To demonstrate its potential utility, we conducted a multi-center preRCT using the alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) model to assess the impact of ketamine and R-ketamine on alcohol relapse across three European research centers. Ketamine (20 mg/kg) significantly reduced relapse, while R-ketamine showed efficacy only in females. A higher dose of R-ketamine (40 mg/kg) was also effective in males. These sex-dependent effects were linked to plasma R-ketamine levels, which were two-fold higher in female compared to male rats. Notably, R-ketamine demonstrated a lasting reduction in alcohol consumption without adverse effects. In conclusion, our preRCT demonstrates R-ketamine’s effectiveness in reducing alcohol relapse and supports translation to a clinical RCT that accounts for sex-dependent effects.
Q1

The crosstalk between CREB and PER2 mediates the transition between mania- and depression-like behavior
Wang X., Ji Y., Li S., Serchov T.
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe psychiatric disorder characterized by alternating manic and depressive episodes. The molecular mechanisms underlying the transition between mania and depression remain unclear. Utilizing a mania animal model induced by ouabain, we observed reduced phosphorylated level of cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein (pCREB) and Period (PER)2 expression in the cornu ammonis (CA1) region of the hippocampus, which were restored by lithium treatment. shRNA knockdown of CREB or Per2 in CA1 region induced mania-like behavior, while overexpression of both factors resulted in depression-like behavior. Furthermore, our protein analyses revealed that the upregulation or downregulation of CREB or Per2 influenced each other’s expression. Co-immunoprecipitation results demonstrated that CREB interacts with PER2. Taken together, our data suggest for potential inter-regulatory crosstalk between CREB–PER2 in hippocampal CA1 region, which mediates the transition between mania- and depression-like behaviors.
Q1

Pharmacological reduction of reverse-translated hippocampal hyperactivity in mouse: relevance for psychosis
Dybowski F.P., Scott D.S., Tamminga C.A.
Q1
Neuropsychopharmacology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Longitudinal associations between white matter integrity, early life adversities, and treatment response following cognitive-behavioral therapy in depression
Flinkenflügel K., Borgers T., Klug M., Mummendey M.M., Leehr E.J., Meinert S., Gruber M., Repple J., Kircher T., Opel N., Bauer J., Zwiky E., König P., Küttner A., Schöniger K., et. al.
Abstract
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a primary treatment for depression. Although previous research has underscored the significant roles of white matter (WM) alterations and maladaptive parenting in depression risk, their associations with CBT response remain largely unknown. This longitudinal study investigated the interplay of WM integrity changes over time, treatment response, and parenting style in patients with depression. Diffusion-tensor-imaging and clinical data were assessed in n = 65 (55% female) patients with depression before and after 20 CBT sessions and n = 65 (68% female) healthy controls (HC) in a naturalistic design. Linear-mixed-effect models compared changes in fractional anisotropy (FA) between groups and tested associations between FA changes and symptom changes. It was investigated whether parenting style predicts depressive symptoms at follow-up and whether FA changes mediate this association. Patients showed differential FA changes over time in the corpus callosum and corona radiata compared to HC (p
tfce-FWE = 0.008). Increases in FA in the corpus callosum, corona radiata and superior longitudinal fasciculus were linked to symptom improvement after CBT in patients (p
tfce-FWE = 0.023). High parental care (p
FDR = 0.010) and low maternal overprotection (p
FDR = 0.001) predicted fewer depressive symptoms at follow-up. The association between maternal overprotection and depressive symptoms at follow-up was mediated by FA changes (p
FDR = 0.044). Robustness checks—controlling for outliers, non-linear age effects, clinical characteristics, and patient subgroups—supported these results. Overall, patients with depression show changes in WM integrity following CBT, which are linked to treatment response. The results highlight the significance of early life adversities and related microstructural changes in the effectiveness of CBT for treating depression.
Q1

Protein interacting with C-kinase 1 (PICK1) regulates synaptic function and reversal learning in a mouse model for schizophrenia
Samsom J.N., Xu M., Ávila A., Daskalakis A.A., Dai J.H., Gao X., Georgiou J., Collingridge G.L., Liu F., Wong A.H.
Q1
Neuropsychopharmacology
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q1

Prediction of alcohol intake patterns with olfactory and gustatory brain connectivity networks
Agarwal K., Chaudhary S., Tomasi D., Volkow N.D., Joseph P.V.
Abstract
Craving in alcohol drinkers is often triggered by chemosensory cues, such as taste and smell, which are linked to brain network connectivity. This study aimed to investigate whether these brain connectivity patterns could predict alcohol intake in young adults. Resting-state fMRI data were obtained from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) Young Adult cohort, comprising 1003 participants. Functional connectomes generated from 100 independent components were analyzed, identifying significant connections correlated with taste and odor scores after applying a false discovery rate (FDR) correction using the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method. These significant connections were then utilized as predictors in general linear models for various alcohol intake metrics. The models were validated in an independent sample to assess their accuracy. The training sample (n = 702) and the validation sample (n = 117) showed no significant demographic differences. Out of 742 possible connections, 41 related to odor and 25 related to taste passed the significance threshold (P < 0.05) after FDR-BH correction. Notable predictors included visual-visual connectivity (node32-node13: β = 0.028, P = 0.02) for wine consumption and connectivity between the ventral attention network (VAN) and the frontal parietal/caudate nucleus (FP/CN) (node27-node9: β = −0.31, P = 0.04) for total alcohol intake in the past-week and maximum number of drinks per day in the past-year. The predictive models demonstrated strong accuracy, with root mean square error (RMSE) values of 5.15 for odor-related models and 5.14 for taste-related models. The F1 scores were 0.74 for the odor model and 0.71 for the taste model, indicating reliable performance. These findings suggest that specific patterns of brain connectivity associated with taste and olfactory perception may serve as predictors of alcohol consumption behaviors in young adults. Our study highlight the need for longitudinal research to evaluate the potential of taste- and smell-related brain connectivity patterns for early screening and targeted interventions, as well as their role in personalized treatment strategies for individuals at risk of AUD.
Q1

REM density predicts rapid antidepressant response to ketamine in individuals with treatment-resistant depression
Kheirkhah M., Duncan W.C., Yuan Q., Wang P.R., Jamalabadi H., Leistritz L., Walter M., Goldman D., Zarate C.A., Hejazi N.S.
Abstract
Abnormalities during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep contribute to the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD), but few studies have explored the relationship between REM sleep and treatment-resistant depression (TRD). In MDD, REM sleep abnormalities often manifest as alterations in total night REM Density (RD), RD in the first REM period (RD1), and REM Latency (RL). Among these, RD1 is notably considered a potential endophenotype of depression. This study compared REM sleep markers between 63 drug-free individuals with TRD (39 F/24 M) and 41 healthy volunteers (25 F/16 M). It also investigated the effects of ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, on these REM sleep variables. Specifically, the study investigated whether RD1 could predict antidepressant response to ketamine. TRD participants showed higher RD1 and shorter RL at baseline compared to HVs, as assessed via non-parametric tests, but Total Night RD did not differ between the two groups. Ketamine treatment decreased RD1 in TRD participants but did not affect Total Night RD or RL. As assessed via the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm, baseline RD1 level moderately predicted antidepressant response to ketamine versus non-response (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.73, with a median accuracy of 0.75), wherein TRD participants with higher baseline RD1 were more likely to respond to ketamine. These results underscore the utility of RD1 for identifying individuals most likely to benefit from ketamine treatment, enabling more targeted and effective therapeutic strategies. Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT00088699, NCT01204918.
Q1

Frontostriatal regulation of brain circuits contributes to flexible decision making
Duan Y., Ma Z., Tsai P., Lu H., Xiao X., Wang D., Siddiqi A., Stein E.A., Michaelides M., Yang Y.
Abstract
Deficits in behavioral or cognitive flexibility that are linked to altered activity in both cortical and subcortical brain regions, are often observed across multiple neuropsychiatric disorders. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)-nucleus accumbens (NAc) pathway in rats plays a critical role in flexible control of behavior. However, the modulation of this pathway on activity and functional connectivity with the rest of the brain remains unclear. In this study, we first confirmed the role of the mPFC-NAc pathway in behavioral flexibility using a set-shifting task in rats and then evaluated the causal effects of mPFC-NAc activation induced by chemogenetic stimulation of the terminal axons of the NAc with DREADD expression on whole-brain activity and functional connectivity measured by functional MRI. mPFC-NAc activation improved performance on the set-shifting task by reducing perseverative errors. Additionally, stimulation of this pathway increased activity in a set of brain regions within the basal ganglia-thalamus-cortical loop network including NAc, thalamus, hypothalamus and various connected cortical regions, while also decreased functional connectivity strength of NAc-mPFC, NAc-secondary motor cortex (M2), and various cortical circuits. Moreover, performance on the set-shifting task was related to the functional connectivity strength of the above frontostriatal and cortical circuits. These findings provide insights into the link between specific frontostriatal circuits on decision making flexibility, which may inform potential future interventions for behavioral flexibility deficits.
Q1

Validation of L-type calcium channel blocker amlodipine as a novel ADHD treatment through cross-species analysis, drug-target Mendelian randomization, and clinical evidence from medical records
Þorsteinsson H., Baukmann H.A., Sveinsdóttir H.S., Halldórsdóttir D.Þ., Grzymala B., Hillman C., Rolfe-Tarrant J., Parker M.O., Cope J.L., Ravarani C.N., Schmidt M.F., Karlsson K.Æ.
Abstract
ADHD is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder that significantly affects life outcomes, and current treatments often have adverse side effects, high abuse potential, and a 25% non-response rate, highlighting the need for new therapeutics. This study investigates amlodipine, an L-type calcium channel blocker, as a potential foundation for developing a novel ADHD treatment by integrating findings from animal models and human genetic data. Amlodipine reduced hyperactivity in SHR rats and decreased both hyperactivity and impulsivity in adgrl3.1−/− zebrafish. It also crosses the blood-brain barrier, reducing telencephalic activation. Crucially, Mendelian Randomization analysis linked ADHD to genetic variations in L-type calcium channel subunits (α1-C; CACNA1C, β1; CACNB1, α2δ3; CACNA2D3) targeted by amlodipine, while polygenic risk score analysis showed symptom mitigation in individuals with high ADHD genetic liability. With its well-tolerated profile and efficacy across species, supported by genetic evidence, amlodipine shows potential to be refined and developed into a novel treatment for ADHD.
Q1

Extended amygdala corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons regulate sexually dimorphic changes in pair bond formation following social defeat in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Tickerhoof M.C., Nerio Morales L.K., Goff J., Vitale E.M., Smith A.S.
The neurobiological mechanisms underlying the connection between anxiety brought on by social stressors and the negative impact on relationship formation have remained elusive. In order to address this question, we used the social defeat model in the socially monogamous prairie vole to investigate the impact of this stress on pair bond formation. Social defeat experience inhibited partner preference formation in males but promoted preference in females. Furthermore, pair bonding increased corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) expression in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) in male prairie voles, while defeat experience increased BNST CRH expression in females. Chemogenetic excitation of BNST CRH neurons during a short cohabitation with a new partner promoted a partner preference in stress-naïve prairie voles. Interestingly, chemogenetic inhibition of BNST CRH neurons during cohabitation with a new partner blocked partner preference in stress-naïve males but promoted preference in defeated males. Inhibition of BNST CRH neurons also blocked partner preference in stress-naïve females but did not alter preference behavior in defeated females. This study revealed sexual dimorphism in not only the impact of social defeat on pair bond formation, but also in the role BNST CRHergic neurons play in regulating changes in pair bonding following social conflict.
Q1

Absence of TAAR1 function increases methamphetamine-induced excitability of dorsal raphe serotonin neurons and drives binge-level methamphetamine intake
Rios S.M., Mootz J.R., Phillips T.J., Ingram S.L.
Abstract
Methamphetamine (MA) is a potent psychostimulant capable of exerting both rewarding and aversive effects, the balance of which likely drives variation in voluntary MA intake. Understanding the genetic factors underlying sensitivity to these effects of MA is critical for developing effective treatments. The activity of dorsal raphe serotonin neurons is linked to reward processing. Here, we performed whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology in dorsal raphe serotonin neurons from mice with high or low MA intake corresponding with high or low MA reward sensitivity. The MA drinking (MADR) mice consist of the MA reward sensitive MA high drinking (MAHDR) and the MA reward insensitive MA low drinking (MALDR) lines. MA is a trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) agonist, and MAHDR mice are homozygous for a mutation in the Taar1 gene, Taar1
m1J
, that encodes non-functional TAAR1, whereas MALDR mice possess at least one copy of the reference Taar1
+
allele that encodes functional TAAR1. Our previous research using CRISPR-Cas9-generated MAHDR-Taar1
+/+
knock-in mice in which Taar1
m1J
was replaced with Taar1
+
, and non-edited MAHDR-Taar1
m1J/m1J
controls demonstrated that lack of TAAR1 function is critical for heightened MA consumption and MA reward sensitivity. Here, electrophysiological recordings in the MADR lines demonstrate a MA-induced decrease in dorsal raphe serotonin neuron activity from MALDR, but not MAHDR mice. However, in the presence of serotonin autoreceptor antagonists, MA potentiates dorsal raphe serotonin neuron activity of MAHDR, but not MALDR mice. Importantly, potentiation in the presence of the antagonists is abolished in knock-in mice expressing functional TAAR1. The knock-in mice did not display binge-level MA intake, consistent with the loss of MA-reward sensitivity previously reported in mice with functional TAAR1. Finally, because MA is a substrate of the serotonin transporter, we evaluated whether the serotonin transporter is necessary for MA-induced potentiation of dorsal raphe serotonin neuron activity in mice with non-functional TAAR1. The serotonin transporter antagonist fluoxetine blocks MA-induced potentiation for both MAHDR and MAHDR-Taar1
m1J/m1J
mice. Thus, TAAR1 function directly impacts MA reward sensitivity and MA intake and serves as a critical regulator of MA-induced activity of dorsal raphe serotonin neurons through its interaction with the serotonin transporter.
Q1

A molecular mechanism mediating clozapine-enhanced sensorimotor gating
Mantas I., Flais I., Branzell N., Ionescu T.M., Kim E., Zhang X., Cash D., Hengerer B., Svenningsson P.
Abstract
The atypical antipsychotic clozapine targets multiple receptor systems beyond the dopaminergic pathway and influences prepulse inhibition (PPI), a critical translational measure of sensorimotor gating. Since PPI is modulated by atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone and clozapine, we hypothesized that p11—an adaptor protein associated with anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors and G-protein-coupled receptor function—might modulate these effects. In this study, we assessed the role of p11 in clozapine’s PPI-enhancing effect by testing wild-type and global p11 knockout (KO) mice in response to haloperidol, risperidone, and clozapine. We also performed structural and functional brain imaging. Contrary to our expectation that anxiety-like p11-KO mice would exhibit an augmented startle response and heightened sensitivity to clozapine, PPI tests showed that p11-KO mice were unresponsive to the PPI-enhancing effects of risperidone and clozapine. Imaging revealed distinct regional brain volume differences and reduced hippocampal connectivity in p11-KO mice, with significantly blunted clozapine-induced connectivity changes in the CA1 region. Our findings highlight a novel role for p11 in modulating clozapine’s effects on sensorimotor gating and hippocampal connectivity, offering new insight into its functional pathways.
Q1

Brain and cardiovascular responses to acute stress in remitted and recurrent late-life depression
Kraynak T.E., Karim H.T., Banihashemi L., Krafty R.T., Butters M.A., Ajilore O.A., Taylor W.D., Andreescu C.
In individuals with remitted late-life depression (LLD), stress exposure can increase the likelihood of a new, recurrent depressive episode. Variability in the effect of stress on recurrence risk may reflect underlying brain and physiological processes mediating the stress response. We examined how subjective, physiological, and brain responses to an experimental stressor differs in older adults with and without remitted depression, and how these stress responses relate to future relapse. Participants were recruited through 3 sites and included 76 older adults with remitted LLD and 36 age-matched healthy comparison (HC) adults. Participants completed an acute stressor task during functional brain imaging with behavioral and cardiovascular monitoring. Remitted LLD participants were followed longitudinally to evaluate depression recurrence. Compared to HC, the remitted LLD group exhibited reduced stressor-evoked systolic blood pressure and heart rate responses, as well as reduced stressor-evoked posterior insula activity. This blunted stress response phenotype appeared more specific to the stable remitter group than the relapsing LLD group. Survival analyses demonstrated that greater stressor-evoked bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) activity was associated with faster time to recurrence. These findings add to a growing literature reporting so-called “blunted” stressor-evoked cardiovascular and brain reactivity in remitted depression. Moreover, they link the stress response in visceral interoceptive brain circuits with relapse vulnerability. Future work involving longer follow-up periods may reveal additional stress-related brain and behavioral predictors of recurrence in remitted LLD.
Q1

N-acetylcysteine for youth cannabis use disorder: randomized controlled trial main findings
Gray K.M., Tomko R.L., Baker N.L., McClure E.A., McRae-Clark A.L., Squeglia L.M.
Abstract
Cannabis use disorder is particularly prevalent and impairing among young people, and evidence-based treatments are limited. Prior trials of N-acetylcysteine, added to contingency management as a platform behavioral intervention, yielded positive findings in youth but not in adults. This trial sought to rigorously evaluate whether N-acetylcysteine is efficacious in youth when not paired with a robust behavioral treatment platform. Treatment-seeking youth with cannabis use disorder (N = 192, ages 14–21) were randomized to receive a double-blind 12-week course of oral N-acetylcysteine 1200 mg or placebo twice daily; all received weekly medical management and brief behavioral counseling. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of negative urine cannabinoid tests during treatment, compared between groups. An array of self-report and urine testing measures were examined secondarily to assess cannabis use reduction and cessation outcomes. The N-acetylcysteine and placebo groups did not differ in proportion of negative urine cannabinoid tests (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.53, 1.64; p = 0.80) or self-reported cannabis abstinence (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.63, 1.65; p = 0.93) during treatment. The mean percentage of cannabis use days and grams of cannabis used per using day decreased over time during treatment but did not differ between groups. More N-acetylcysteine than placebo treated participants reported gastrointestinal adverse events (63/98 versus 37/94, χ2
1 = 11.9 p < 0.001); adverse events were otherwise similar between groups. Findings indicate that N-acetylcysteine is not efficacious for youth cannabis use disorder when not paired with contingency management, highlighting the potentially crucial role of a robust behavioral treatment platform in facilitating prior positive efficacy findings with N-acetylcysteine.
Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03055377
Top-100
Citing journals
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
|
LWT - Food Science and Technology
28450 citations, 5.51%
|
|
Foods
24926 citations, 4.83%
|
|
Food Chemistry
23163 citations, 4.49%
|
|
Food Research International
13463 citations, 2.61%
|
|
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
12138 citations, 2.35%
|
|
Food Hydrocolloids
10402 citations, 2.02%
|
|
Food Bioscience
8751 citations, 1.7%
|
|
International Journal of Food Science and Technology
8462 citations, 1.64%
|
|
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
8351 citations, 1.62%
|
|
Molecules
8025 citations, 1.56%
|
|
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
6534 citations, 1.27%
|
|
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
6372 citations, 1.23%
|
|
Trends in Food Science and Technology
6265 citations, 1.21%
|
|
Journal of Food Science
6224 citations, 1.21%
|
|
Journal of Food Engineering
5691 citations, 1.1%
|
|
Journal of Food Science and Technology
5635 citations, 1.09%
|
|
Food and Bioprocess Technology
5559 citations, 1.08%
|
|
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization
5287 citations, 1.02%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
4954 citations, 0.96%
|
|
Food Control
4792 citations, 0.93%
|
|
Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies
4392 citations, 0.85%
|
|
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
3963 citations, 0.77%
|
|
Food Chemistry: X
3485 citations, 0.68%
|
|
Carbohydrate Polymers
3234 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3213 citations, 0.62%
|
|
Journal of Food Process Engineering
3171 citations, 0.61%
|
|
Food Science and Nutrition
2833 citations, 0.55%
|
|
Antioxidants
2575 citations, 0.5%
|
|
European Food Research and Technology
2556 citations, 0.5%
|
|
Frontiers in Nutrition
2518 citations, 0.49%
|
|
Industrial Crops and Products
2483 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
2468 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Meat Science
2453 citations, 0.48%
|
|
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
2442 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Postharvest Biology and Technology
2311 citations, 0.45%
|
|
International Journal of Food Microbiology
2289 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Fermentation
2232 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Frontiers in Microbiology
2222 citations, 0.43%
|
|
Polymers
2104 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Food and Function
2075 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Heliyon
2019 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Drying Technology
2000 citations, 0.39%
|
|
International Journal of Food Properties
1954 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Food Reviews International
1931 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Journal of Cereal Science
1884 citations, 0.37%
|
|
International Dairy Journal
1870 citations, 0.36%
|
|
Processes
1753 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Food Packaging and Shelf Life
1751 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Food Science and Biotechnology
1750 citations, 0.34%
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1629 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Scientific Reports
1581 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Journal of Functional Foods
1550 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Food Microbiology
1548 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Dairy Science
1548 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Plants
1532 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Food Science and Technology International
1450 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Scientia Horticulturae
1435 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Food and Bioproducts Processing
1400 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Microorganisms
1399 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Food Science and Technology
1365 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Starch/Staerke
1304 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cereal Chemistry
1245 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Food Quality
1142 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Nutrients
1102 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Current Research in Food Science
1074 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Food Analytical Methods
1011 citations, 0.2%
|
|
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
1010 citations, 0.2%
|
|
International Journal of Dairy Technology
971 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Applied Food Research
955 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of Texture Studies
949 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Food Chemistry Advances
935 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Food Biochemistry
931 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Current Opinion in Food Science
909 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Agronomy
873 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Food Engineering Reviews
864 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology
841 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Gels
835 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Horticulturae
820 citations, 0.16%
|
|
European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology
806 citations, 0.16%
|
|
CYTA - Journal of Food
803 citations, 0.16%
|
|
ACS Food Science & Technology
803 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
803 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Coatings
800 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Sustainability
797 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Process Biochemistry
779 citations, 0.15%
|
|
RSC Advances
768 citations, 0.15%
|
|
JAOCS, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
764 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Journal of Food Protection
756 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Food Engineering Series
754 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science
742 citations, 0.14%
|
|
International Journal of Food Engineering
741 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Future Foods
733 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
732 citations, 0.14%
|
|
PLoS ONE
713 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
704 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Journal of Food Safety
699 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Microchemical Journal
690 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Acta Horticulturae
689 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
683 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Frontiers in Plant Science
672 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
|
Citing publishers
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
|
|
Elsevier
219709 citations, 42.58%
|
|
MDPI
67851 citations, 13.15%
|
|
Wiley
66123 citations, 12.81%
|
|
Springer Nature
50972 citations, 9.88%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
25366 citations, 4.92%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
9259 citations, 1.79%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
7886 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
5341 citations, 1.04%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
4079 citations, 0.79%
|
|
SAGE
2462 citations, 0.48%
|
|
IOP Publishing
2078 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
2075 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Science and Technology
1647 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Sociedade Brasileira de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos
1583 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1257 citations, 0.24%
|
|
SciELO
1162 citations, 0.23%
|
|
IntechOpen
1131 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Emerald
999 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Oxford University Press
954 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
927 citations, 0.18%
|
|
King Saud University
839 citations, 0.16%
|
|
International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS)
829 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Science Alert
818 citations, 0.16%
|
|
EDP Sciences
810 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
777 citations, 0.15%
|
|
AIP Publishing
765 citations, 0.15%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
738 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
725 citations, 0.14%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
618 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
555 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
524 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
523 citations, 0.1%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
509 citations, 0.1%
|
|
498 citations, 0.1%
|
|
HACCP Consulting
469 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
455 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
446 citations, 0.09%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
435 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology
430 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos (ITAL)
426 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
385 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Annual Reviews
367 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Kemerovo State University
361 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
343 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
339 citations, 0.07%
|
|
IGI Global
337 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
325 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
306 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Academic Journals
261 citations, 0.05%
|
|
PeerJ
255 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Oil Chemists' Society
255 citations, 0.05%
|
|
S. Karger AG
231 citations, 0.04%
|
|
IOS Press
212 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Dairy Science Association
212 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
201 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
197 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Gorbatov's All-Russian Meat Research Institute
193 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Enviro Research Publishers
189 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Instituto de Tecnologia do Parana
183 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
180 citations, 0.03%
|
|
F1000 Research
180 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
175 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Asian Network for Scientific Information
166 citations, 0.03%
|
|
American Society for Horticultural Science
165 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias
151 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Preservation
146 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
134 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology
126 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences
123 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASABE)
106 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Universiti Putra Malaysia
101 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Veterinary World
91 citations, 0.02%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
89 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
88 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
87 citations, 0.02%
|
|
American Society of Brewing Chemists
87 citations, 0.02%
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
84 citations, 0.02%
|
|
National Library of Serbia
81 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Korean Society of Industrial Engineering Chemistry
79 citations, 0.02%
|
|
Microbiology Society
76 citations, 0.01%
|
|
A and V Publications
76 citations, 0.01%
|
|
World Scientific
74 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Akademik Gida
74 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Editorial CSIC
72 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
67 citations, 0.01%
|
|
FSBEI HE Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies
67 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Korean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering
66 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
66 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Tong Kwahak Hoe
64 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology
64 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Maad Rayan Publishing Company
61 citations, 0.01%
|
|
The Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry
59 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
58 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Brill
58 citations, 0.01%
|
|
International Society for Nutraceuticals & Functional Foods (ISNFF)
58 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Society of Animal Science
57 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Begell House
56 citations, 0.01%
|
|
American Scientific Publishers
56 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Faculty of Agriculture, Ain-Shams University
56 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Japan Society for Food Engineering
56 citations, 0.01%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
|
Publishing organizations
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
|
Jiangnan University
408 publications, 2.34%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
232 publications, 1.33%
|
|
South China University of Technology
196 publications, 1.12%
|
|
Northeast Agricultural University
196 publications, 1.12%
|
|
China Agricultural University
170 publications, 0.97%
|
|
Northwest University
154 publications, 0.88%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
150 publications, 0.86%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
148 publications, 0.85%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
143 publications, 0.82%
|
|
Jiangsu University
136 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Henan University of Technology
129 publications, 0.74%
|
|
Beijing Technology and Business University
124 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Zhejiang University
123 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Central Food Technological Research Institute
122 publications, 0.7%
|
|
Nanchang University
115 publications, 0.66%
|
|
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
114 publications, 0.65%
|
|
National University of La Plata
103 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology
98 publications, 0.56%
|
|
McGill University
94 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
93 publications, 0.53%
|
|
Dalian Polytechnic University
92 publications, 0.53%
|
|
University of Milan
90 publications, 0.52%
|
|
Korea University
88 publications, 0.5%
|
|
University College Dublin
88 publications, 0.5%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
84 publications, 0.48%
|
|
Washington State University
83 publications, 0.48%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
81 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
81 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Federal University of Santa Catarina
78 publications, 0.45%
|
|
University of Guelph
78 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Southwest University
77 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Anhui Agricultural University
76 publications, 0.44%
|
|
University of Buenos Aires
75 publications, 0.43%
|
|
Prince of Songkla University
73 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Ocean University of China
71 publications, 0.41%
|
|
Ghent University
70 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Shanghai Ocean University
70 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Warsaw University of Life Sciences
69 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National Dairy Research Institute
68 publications, 0.39%
|
|
University of California, Davis
67 publications, 0.38%
|
|
University of Bologna
65 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Cornell University
65 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
65 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Wuhan Polytechnic University
64 publications, 0.37%
|
|
Tianjin University of Science and Technology
64 publications, 0.37%
|
|
University Putra Malaysia
63 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Korea Food Research Institute
63 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
61 publications, 0.35%
|
|
National University of Singapore
61 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Purdue University
60 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
59 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
57 publications, 0.33%
|
|
University of Helsinki
55 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
55 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
55 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Qingdao Agricultural University
55 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Kasetsart University
55 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Valencia
55 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Instituto de la Grasa
54 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Seoul National University
53 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Porto
53 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Yildiz Technical University
52 publications, 0.3%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
52 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
52 publications, 0.3%
|
|
Sichuan University
51 publications, 0.29%
|
|
National Chung Hsing University
51 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Qilu University of Technology
50 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Belgrade
50 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of Tehran
49 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Jinan University
49 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Universidade Estadual Paulista
49 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
48 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Henan University of Science and Technology
48 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Manitoba
48 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University of Vigo
48 publications, 0.28%
|
|
University College Cork (National University of Ireland, Cork)
48 publications, 0.28%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
47 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Ohio State University
47 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Avignon University
47 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
47 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Extremadura
47 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Parma
46 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
46 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Naples Federico II
45 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
45 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
45 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Foggia
45 publications, 0.26%
|
|
University of Queensland
45 publications, 0.26%
|
|
ETH Zurich
44 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
44 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yangzhou University
44 publications, 0.25%
|
|
North Carolina State University
44 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Lleida
44 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Lisbon
43 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Shihezi University
43 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Hohenheim
43 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Middle East Technical University
42 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Hebei Agricultural University
42 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Bohai University
42 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Jiangxi Agricultural University
42 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
50
100
150
200
250
|
|
Jiangnan University
245 publications, 2.88%
|
|
Northeast Agricultural University
155 publications, 1.82%
|
|
Northwest University
115 publications, 1.35%
|
|
South China University of Technology
114 publications, 1.34%
|
|
Northwest A&F University
110 publications, 1.29%
|
|
Henan University of Technology
104 publications, 1.22%
|
|
Jiangsu University
100 publications, 1.18%
|
|
China Agricultural University
96 publications, 1.13%
|
|
Nanchang University
93 publications, 1.09%
|
|
Huazhong Agricultural University
88 publications, 1.03%
|
|
Beijing Technology and Business University
86 publications, 1.01%
|
|
Nanjing Agricultural University
82 publications, 0.96%
|
|
Dalian Polytechnic University
77 publications, 0.91%
|
|
South China Agricultural University
66 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Anhui Agricultural University
66 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
66 publications, 0.78%
|
|
Zhejiang University
61 publications, 0.72%
|
|
Southwest University
60 publications, 0.71%
|
|
Wuhan Polytechnic University
59 publications, 0.69%
|
|
Shanghai Ocean University
58 publications, 0.68%
|
|
Ocean University of China
53 publications, 0.62%
|
|
Zhejiang Gongshang University
50 publications, 0.59%
|
|
Sichuan Agricultural University
46 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Wageningen University and Research Centre
46 publications, 0.54%
|
|
Tianjin University of Science and Technology
43 publications, 0.51%
|
|
Henan University of Science and Technology
42 publications, 0.49%
|
|
Sichuan University
40 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Jiangxi Agricultural University
40 publications, 0.47%
|
|
Shihezi University
39 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Guizhou University
39 publications, 0.46%
|
|
Hebei Agricultural University
38 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Qingdao Agricultural University
38 publications, 0.45%
|
|
Yangzhou University
37 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Qilu University of Technology
37 publications, 0.44%
|
|
Shenyang Agricultural University
36 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Hefei University of Technology
36 publications, 0.42%
|
|
Inner Mongolia Agricultural University
34 publications, 0.4%
|
|
Chulalongkorn University
34 publications, 0.4%
|
|
National University of Singapore
32 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Bohai University
32 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Hainan University
32 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Polytechnic University of Valencia
32 publications, 0.38%
|
|
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
31 publications, 0.36%
|
|
Hubei University of Technology
30 publications, 0.35%
|
|
University of Bari Aldo Moro
30 publications, 0.35%
|
|
Zhejiang University of Technology
29 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Jinan University
29 publications, 0.34%
|
|
Seoul National University
29 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University College Dublin
29 publications, 0.34%
|
|
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology
28 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering
28 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Xihua University
28 publications, 0.33%
|
|
Nanjing Forestry University
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
University of Milan
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Chengdu University
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Korea Food Research Institute
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Gansu Agricultural University
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Jiangxi Normal University
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology
27 publications, 0.32%
|
|
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
26 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Warsaw University of Life Sciences
26 publications, 0.31%
|
|
University of Vigo
26 publications, 0.31%
|
|
Central Food Technological Research Institute
25 publications, 0.29%
|
|
Shaanxi Normal University
25 publications, 0.29%
|
|
University of California, Davis
24 publications, 0.28%
|
|
National Dairy Research Institute
23 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Shaanxi University of Science and Technology
23 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Shandong Agricultural University
23 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Ningbo University
23 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Yunnan Agricultural University
23 publications, 0.27%
|
|
University of Guelph
23 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
23 publications, 0.27%
|
|
Jilin University
22 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Nanjing University
22 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Massey University
22 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Hunan Agricultural University
22 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Guangxi University
22 publications, 0.26%
|
|
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Ghent University
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Beijing Forestry University
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Guangdong Ocean University
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Harbin University of Commerce
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Korea University
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
McGill University
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Valencia
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
University of Extremadura
21 publications, 0.25%
|
|
Yildiz Technical University
20 publications, 0.24%
|
|
University of Copenhagen
20 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Zhengzhou University of Light Industry
20 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Federal University of Santa Catarina
20 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Purdue University
20 publications, 0.24%
|
|
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Shiraz University
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Urmia University
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Technical University of Denmark
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Washington State University
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Ohio State University
19 publications, 0.22%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
50
100
150
200
250
|
Publishing countries
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
|
China
|
China, 4679, 26.81%
China
4679 publications, 26.81%
|
USA
|
USA, 1452, 8.32%
USA
1452 publications, 8.32%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 1205, 6.91%
Spain
1205 publications, 6.91%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 1100, 6.3%
Brazil
1100 publications, 6.3%
|
India
|
India, 758, 4.34%
India
758 publications, 4.34%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 754, 4.32%
Italy
754 publications, 4.32%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 601, 3.44%
Republic of Korea
601 publications, 3.44%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 519, 2.97%
Turkey
519 publications, 2.97%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 423, 2.42%
Canada
423 publications, 2.42%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 421, 2.41%
Argentina
421 publications, 2.41%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 376, 2.15%
Iran
376 publications, 2.15%
|
France
|
France, 353, 2.02%
France
353 publications, 2.02%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 346, 1.98%
Poland
346 publications, 1.98%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 345, 1.98%
Thailand
345 publications, 1.98%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 318, 1.82%
Mexico
318 publications, 1.82%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 290, 1.66%
Germany
290 publications, 1.66%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 255, 1.46%
Portugal
255 publications, 1.46%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 236, 1.35%
Australia
236 publications, 1.35%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 235, 1.35%
Japan
235 publications, 1.35%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 192, 1.1%
United Kingdom
192 publications, 1.1%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 179, 1.03%
Ireland
179 publications, 1.03%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 158, 0.91%
Malaysia
158 publications, 0.91%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 157, 0.9%
Denmark
157 publications, 0.9%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 155, 0.89%
Belgium
155 publications, 0.89%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 139, 0.8%
Greece
139 publications, 0.8%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 137, 0.79%
New Zealand
137 publications, 0.79%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 137, 0.79%
Switzerland
137 publications, 0.79%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 136, 0.78%
Egypt
136 publications, 0.78%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 121, 0.69%
Finland
121 publications, 0.69%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 118, 0.68%
Netherlands
118 publications, 0.68%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 116, 0.66%
Chile
116 publications, 0.66%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 101, 0.58%
Norway
101 publications, 0.58%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 101, 0.58%
Sweden
101 publications, 0.58%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 92, 0.53%
Serbia
92 publications, 0.53%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 83, 0.48%
Tunisia
83 publications, 0.48%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 79, 0.45%
Pakistan
79 publications, 0.45%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 77, 0.44%
Singapore
77 publications, 0.44%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 77, 0.44%
South Africa
77 publications, 0.44%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 73, 0.42%
Nigeria
73 publications, 0.42%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 64, 0.37%
Colombia
64 publications, 0.37%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 64, 0.37%
Saudi Arabia
64 publications, 0.37%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 60, 0.34%
Czech Republic
60 publications, 0.34%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 57, 0.33%
Israel
57 publications, 0.33%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 55, 0.32%
Austria
55 publications, 0.32%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 49, 0.28%
Croatia
49 publications, 0.28%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 43, 0.25%
Romania
43 publications, 0.25%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 42, 0.24%
Lithuania
42 publications, 0.24%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 41, 0.23%
Slovenia
41 publications, 0.23%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 36, 0.21%
UAE
36 publications, 0.21%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 34, 0.19%
Hungary
34 publications, 0.19%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 30, 0.17%
Peru
30 publications, 0.17%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 26, 0.15%
Ghana
26 publications, 0.15%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 26, 0.15%
Morocco
26 publications, 0.15%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 26, 0.15%
Ecuador
26 publications, 0.15%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 23, 0.13%
Philippines
23 publications, 0.13%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 22, 0.13%
Bangladesh
22 publications, 0.13%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 22, 0.13%
Venezuela
22 publications, 0.13%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 22, 0.13%
Indonesia
22 publications, 0.13%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 21, 0.12%
Algeria
21 publications, 0.12%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 21, 0.12%
Vietnam
21 publications, 0.12%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 21, 0.12%
Uruguay
21 publications, 0.12%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 19, 0.11%
Ethiopia
19 publications, 0.11%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 17, 0.1%
Jordan
17 publications, 0.1%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 17, 0.1%
Kenya
17 publications, 0.1%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 16, 0.09%
Latvia
16 publications, 0.09%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 15, 0.09%
Russia
15 publications, 0.09%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 15, 0.09%
Cameroon
15 publications, 0.09%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 14, 0.08%
Slovakia
14 publications, 0.08%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 14, 0.08%
Sri Lanka
14 publications, 0.08%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 12, 0.07%
Iceland
12 publications, 0.07%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 12, 0.07%
Kuwait
12 publications, 0.07%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 12, 0.07%
Lebanon
12 publications, 0.07%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 12, 0.07%
Sudan
12 publications, 0.07%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 11, 0.06%
Iraq
11 publications, 0.06%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 10, 0.06%
Cyprus
10 publications, 0.06%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 9, 0.05%
Bulgaria
9 publications, 0.05%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 8, 0.05%
Benin
8 publications, 0.05%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 7, 0.04%
Estonia
7 publications, 0.04%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 7, 0.04%
Zambia
7 publications, 0.04%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 7, 0.04%
Yemen
7 publications, 0.04%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 6, 0.03%
North Macedonia
6 publications, 0.03%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 5, 0.03%
Kazakhstan
5 publications, 0.03%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 5, 0.03%
Ukraine
5 publications, 0.03%
|
Cuba
|
Cuba, 5, 0.03%
Cuba
5 publications, 0.03%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 5, 0.03%
Uganda
5 publications, 0.03%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 4, 0.02%
Oman
4 publications, 0.02%
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina, 3, 0.02%
Bosnia and Herzegovina
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Botswana
|
Botswana, 3, 0.02%
Botswana
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 3, 0.02%
Honduras
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Zimbabwe
|
Zimbabwe, 3, 0.02%
Zimbabwe
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
Democratic Republic of the Congo, 3, 0.02%
Democratic Republic of the Congo
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 3, 0.02%
Malawi
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 3, 0.02%
Malta
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 3, 0.02%
Mozambique
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Montenegro
|
Montenegro, 3, 0.02%
Montenegro
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Jamaica
|
Jamaica, 3, 0.02%
Jamaica
3 publications, 0.02%
|
Greenland
|
Greenland, 2, 0.01%
Greenland
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 2, 0.01%
Kyrgyzstan
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 2, 0.01%
Costa Rica
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 2, 0.01%
Côte d'Ivoire
2 publications, 0.01%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
China
|
China, 3329, 39.15%
China
3329 publications, 39.15%
|
USA
|
USA, 431, 5.07%
USA
431 publications, 5.07%
|
Spain
|
Spain, 399, 4.69%
Spain
399 publications, 4.69%
|
Brazil
|
Brazil, 354, 4.16%
Brazil
354 publications, 4.16%
|
India
|
India, 270, 3.17%
India
270 publications, 3.17%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 232, 2.73%
Italy
232 publications, 2.73%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 228, 2.68%
Republic of Korea
228 publications, 2.68%
|
Turkey
|
Turkey, 190, 2.23%
Turkey
190 publications, 2.23%
|
Iran
|
Iran, 182, 2.14%
Iran
182 publications, 2.14%
|
Thailand
|
Thailand, 129, 1.52%
Thailand
129 publications, 1.52%
|
Poland
|
Poland, 126, 1.48%
Poland
126 publications, 1.48%
|
Canada
|
Canada, 115, 1.35%
Canada
115 publications, 1.35%
|
Australia
|
Australia, 97, 1.14%
Australia
97 publications, 1.14%
|
Mexico
|
Mexico, 87, 1.02%
Mexico
87 publications, 1.02%
|
Portugal
|
Portugal, 74, 0.87%
Portugal
74 publications, 0.87%
|
Germany
|
Germany, 68, 0.8%
Germany
68 publications, 0.8%
|
Argentina
|
Argentina, 68, 0.8%
Argentina
68 publications, 0.8%
|
New Zealand
|
New Zealand, 68, 0.8%
New Zealand
68 publications, 0.8%
|
Egypt
|
Egypt, 66, 0.78%
Egypt
66 publications, 0.78%
|
Japan
|
Japan, 65, 0.76%
Japan
65 publications, 0.76%
|
France
|
France, 62, 0.73%
France
62 publications, 0.73%
|
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom, 62, 0.73%
United Kingdom
62 publications, 0.73%
|
Malaysia
|
Malaysia, 58, 0.68%
Malaysia
58 publications, 0.68%
|
Denmark
|
Denmark, 53, 0.62%
Denmark
53 publications, 0.62%
|
Netherlands
|
Netherlands, 52, 0.61%
Netherlands
52 publications, 0.61%
|
Ireland
|
Ireland, 49, 0.58%
Ireland
49 publications, 0.58%
|
Belgium
|
Belgium, 48, 0.56%
Belgium
48 publications, 0.56%
|
Singapore
|
Singapore, 42, 0.49%
Singapore
42 publications, 0.49%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 39, 0.46%
Saudi Arabia
39 publications, 0.46%
|
Serbia
|
Serbia, 37, 0.44%
Serbia
37 publications, 0.44%
|
Colombia
|
Colombia, 34, 0.4%
Colombia
34 publications, 0.4%
|
Pakistan
|
Pakistan, 33, 0.39%
Pakistan
33 publications, 0.39%
|
Finland
|
Finland, 30, 0.35%
Finland
30 publications, 0.35%
|
Chile
|
Chile, 30, 0.35%
Chile
30 publications, 0.35%
|
South Africa
|
South Africa, 26, 0.31%
South Africa
26 publications, 0.31%
|
Sweden
|
Sweden, 25, 0.29%
Sweden
25 publications, 0.29%
|
Greece
|
Greece, 23, 0.27%
Greece
23 publications, 0.27%
|
Switzerland
|
Switzerland, 23, 0.27%
Switzerland
23 publications, 0.27%
|
Nigeria
|
Nigeria, 22, 0.26%
Nigeria
22 publications, 0.26%
|
Norway
|
Norway, 22, 0.26%
Norway
22 publications, 0.26%
|
Romania
|
Romania, 22, 0.26%
Romania
22 publications, 0.26%
|
Tunisia
|
Tunisia, 21, 0.25%
Tunisia
21 publications, 0.25%
|
Czech Republic
|
Czech Republic, 20, 0.24%
Czech Republic
20 publications, 0.24%
|
Hungary
|
Hungary, 18, 0.21%
Hungary
18 publications, 0.21%
|
Ghana
|
Ghana, 16, 0.19%
Ghana
16 publications, 0.19%
|
Peru
|
Peru, 16, 0.19%
Peru
16 publications, 0.19%
|
UAE
|
UAE, 15, 0.18%
UAE
15 publications, 0.18%
|
Slovenia
|
Slovenia, 15, 0.18%
Slovenia
15 publications, 0.18%
|
Croatia
|
Croatia, 15, 0.18%
Croatia
15 publications, 0.18%
|
Ecuador
|
Ecuador, 15, 0.18%
Ecuador
15 publications, 0.18%
|
Austria
|
Austria, 14, 0.16%
Austria
14 publications, 0.16%
|
Indonesia
|
Indonesia, 14, 0.16%
Indonesia
14 publications, 0.16%
|
Lithuania
|
Lithuania, 13, 0.15%
Lithuania
13 publications, 0.15%
|
Vietnam
|
Vietnam, 11, 0.13%
Vietnam
11 publications, 0.13%
|
Israel
|
Israel, 10, 0.12%
Israel
10 publications, 0.12%
|
Jordan
|
Jordan, 10, 0.12%
Jordan
10 publications, 0.12%
|
Morocco
|
Morocco, 10, 0.12%
Morocco
10 publications, 0.12%
|
Ethiopia
|
Ethiopia, 10, 0.12%
Ethiopia
10 publications, 0.12%
|
Bangladesh
|
Bangladesh, 9, 0.11%
Bangladesh
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Philippines
|
Philippines, 9, 0.11%
Philippines
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Sri Lanka
|
Sri Lanka, 9, 0.11%
Sri Lanka
9 publications, 0.11%
|
Iraq
|
Iraq, 8, 0.09%
Iraq
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Uruguay
|
Uruguay, 8, 0.09%
Uruguay
8 publications, 0.09%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 7, 0.08%
Russia
7 publications, 0.08%
|
Cameroon
|
Cameroon, 6, 0.07%
Cameroon
6 publications, 0.07%
|
Zambia
|
Zambia, 5, 0.06%
Zambia
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Cyprus
|
Cyprus, 5, 0.06%
Cyprus
5 publications, 0.06%
|
Estonia
|
Estonia, 4, 0.05%
Estonia
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Algeria
|
Algeria, 4, 0.05%
Algeria
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Latvia
|
Latvia, 4, 0.05%
Latvia
4 publications, 0.05%
|
Kazakhstan
|
Kazakhstan, 3, 0.04%
Kazakhstan
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Ukraine
|
Ukraine, 3, 0.04%
Ukraine
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Honduras
|
Honduras, 3, 0.04%
Honduras
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Yemen
|
Yemen, 3, 0.04%
Yemen
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Kenya
|
Kenya, 3, 0.04%
Kenya
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Kuwait
|
Kuwait, 3, 0.04%
Kuwait
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Lebanon
|
Lebanon, 3, 0.04%
Lebanon
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Slovakia
|
Slovakia, 3, 0.04%
Slovakia
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Sudan
|
Sudan, 3, 0.04%
Sudan
3 publications, 0.04%
|
Bulgaria
|
Bulgaria, 2, 0.02%
Bulgaria
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Iceland
|
Iceland, 2, 0.02%
Iceland
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Malawi
|
Malawi, 2, 0.02%
Malawi
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Samoa
|
Samoa, 2, 0.02%
Samoa
2 publications, 0.02%
|
North Macedonia
|
North Macedonia, 2, 0.02%
North Macedonia
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Uganda
|
Uganda, 2, 0.02%
Uganda
2 publications, 0.02%
|
Benin
|
Benin, 1, 0.01%
Benin
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Venezuela
|
Venezuela, 1, 0.01%
Venezuela
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Guadeloupe
|
Guadeloupe, 1, 0.01%
Guadeloupe
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Georgia
|
Georgia, 1, 0.01%
Georgia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Qatar
|
Qatar, 1, 0.01%
Qatar
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Kyrgyzstan
|
Kyrgyzstan, 1, 0.01%
Kyrgyzstan
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Costa Rica
|
Costa Rica, 1, 0.01%
Costa Rica
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Côte d'Ivoire
|
Côte d'Ivoire, 1, 0.01%
Côte d'Ivoire
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Libya
|
Libya, 1, 0.01%
Libya
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Malta
|
Malta, 1, 0.01%
Malta
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Mozambique
|
Mozambique, 1, 0.01%
Mozambique
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Mongolia
|
Mongolia, 1, 0.01%
Mongolia
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Nepal
|
Nepal, 1, 0.01%
Nepal
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Oman
|
Oman, 1, 0.01%
Oman
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Panama
|
Panama, 1, 0.01%
Panama
1 publication, 0.01%
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
16 profile journal articles
Mecit Halil
151 publications,
3 287 citations
h-index: 33
10 profile journal articles
Bolini Helena

Universidade Estadual de Campinas
162 publications,
4 791 citations
h-index: 43
7 profile journal articles
Leonor Maria
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences, Professor

University of Porto
230 publications,
7 880 citations
h-index: 49
Research interests
Food safety
7 profile journal articles
B. Dave
126 publications,
8 728 citations
h-index: 41
6 profile journal articles
Habibi Najafi Mohammad B.
Professor of the Academy of Sciences of Iran
80 publications,
2 109 citations
h-index: 24
4 profile journal articles
Glamoclija Jasmina
206 publications,
5 894 citations
h-index: 43
4 profile journal articles
Gouda Mostafa
🥼 🤝
PhD in Biological/biomedical sciences, Associate Professor, Associate member of the Egyptian Academy of Scientific Research and Technology

Zhejiang University
85 publications,
1 367 citations
h-index: 24
3 profile journal articles
Harindintwali Jean Damascene
🥼 🤝
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
40 publications,
1 873 citations
h-index: 16
3 profile journal articles
Klaus Anita

University of Belgrade
66 publications,
1 824 citations
h-index: 20
2 profile journal articles
Nateghi Leila
90 publications,
360 citations
h-index: 10
2 profile journal articles
Desai Nivas
🥼
15 publications,
188 citations
h-index: 6
2 profile journal articles
BOUDHRIOUA Nourhene
52 publications,
1 455 citations
h-index: 20
1 profile journal article
Almeida Adelaide
🤝 🥼
288 publications,
10 959 citations
h-index: 55
1 profile journal article
Mihalcea Liliana
🤝
DSc in Health sciences, Associate Professor
18 publications,
180 citations
h-index: 8