Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
Japanese Society for Food Hygiene and Safety
ISSN:
00156426, 18821006
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
SCImago
Q3
WOS
Q4
Impact factor
0.2
SJR
0.249
CiteScore
0.7
Categories
Food Science
Medicine (miscellaneous)
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Areas
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Medicine
Years of issue
1960-2025
journal names
Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
FOOD HYG SAFE SCI
Top-3 citing journals

Journal of Chromatography A
(418 citations)

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(208 citations)
Top-3 organizations

National Institute of Health Sciences
(71 publications)

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health
(45 publications)

Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology
(6 publications)

National Institute of Health Sciences
(8 publications)

Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health
(8 publications)

Teikyo University of Science
(2 publications)
Top-3 countries
Most cited in 5 years
Found
Publications found: 319
Q2

Scepticism about Meaning in the German Enlightenment
Lazurca V.
Abstract
Exegetical scepticism is a strand of scepticism about meaning running through the German Enlightenment. This paper provides the first modern account of its tenets, critics, and proponents, and argues that it shares essential features with modern varieties of meaning-scepticism that have been a preoccupation among philosophers of language since the middle of the twentieth century. I argue that exegetical scepticism is a type of epistemological scepticism first introduced as a philosophical position in a theological debate between August Pfeiffer (1640–1698) and Philipp Jacob Spener (1635–1705). Under contention, so I argue, was the idea that interpretation is never certain because it is necessarily underdetermined by the evidence. Following the effects of this controversy, I show that exegetical scepticism caused a great deal of unrest in German letters in the eighteenth century and can be seen to contribute to the great proliferation of hermeneutical theories in the Aufklärung, indeed to the very birth of hermeneutics as a standalone discipline. Bringing this type of scepticism to contemporary attention supports a reassessment of issues at the heart of meaning-scepticism and hermeneutics itself, and a reconsideration of the histories of Enlightenment scepticism and hermeneutics.
Q2

Claudine Verheggen (ed.), Kripke’s Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language at 40
Tana G.
Q2
International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Sextus Empiricus : Contre les moralistes, translated by René Lefebvre
Cunty D.
Q2
International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Call for Proposals for Monographs and Edited Volumes
Q2
International Journal for the Study of Skepticism
,
2025
,
citations by CoLab: 0

Q2

Replies to Commentators
Pinillos Á.
Abstract
I respond to comments from Branden Fitelson, Chad Gonnerman and John Waterman, and Mark Walker. My response to Fitelson concerns how we should understand the notion of “sensitivity” which is central to my account of why we find skeptical premises intuitive. I argue against his recommendation except for a specific type of “loose” skeptical hypothesis. Gonnerman and Waterman push me to say more about the conditions under which we feel or not feel the skeptical pull. I clarify and expand on the theory presented in the book. Finally, Walker presents a new type of skeptical challenge. To deal with this challenge, I distinguish between two types of skeptical hypotheses, a mild and more substantial one. Walker’s skeptical argument concerns mild skepticism. My account is aimed at more substantial accounts. However, I speculate about how we may respond to this challenge.
Q2

Précis of Why We Doubt
Pinillos Á.
Abstract
I selectively summarize some of the main ideas in my book Why We Doubt, focusing on the elements that are discussed in the replies from commentators. In the book, I investigated our skeptical intuitions which form the basis of the skeptic’s arguments. I argue that these intuitive judgments or inclinations to judge are produced by the deployment of a subconscious heuristic, pbs, which serves us well most of the time but misfires in esoteric cases like those associated with global skepticism. I do this by identifying the rational function of pbs and arguing that when we apply this rational function to global skepticism, it doesn’t yield a skeptical result.
Q2

How Can a Skeptic Write a Book?
Ribeiro B.
Abstract
In this short essay, I will be using my title’s question as a way to explore some of the main themes and most intriguing new ideas in Mark Walker’s Outlines of Skeptical-Dogmatism: On Disbelieving Our Philosophical Views. I will first offer a sketch of Walker’s skeptical-dogmatist view. I will then lay out the “skeptic’s predicament” and explore possible ways of escaping the predicament, viz. longshotting, pseudonymizing, and dialogizing.
Q2

Suspension of Judgment as a Doxastic Default
Satta M.
Abstract
In Outlines of Skeptical-Dogmatism, Mark Walker argues for Skeptical-Dogmatism about philosophical views—i.e., he argues that we should disbelieve most philosophical views. Walker argues for Skeptical-Dogmatism over both Dogmatism and Skepticism. In response, I defend Skepticism—i.e., the view that we should neither believe nor disbelieve most philosophical views. I argue that Walker’s arguments overlook some of the most plausible forms of philosophical Skepticism where the Skeptic suspends judgment about most disputed philosophical views without assigning a credence of 0.5 to those views. In doing so, I argue that suspension of judgment is the default justified doxastic attitude—i.e., the doxastic attitude one is epistemically justified in adopting absent any reason to do otherwise. I also champion Skepticism by offering modified versions of some of Walker’s thought experiments, posing challenges for Skeptical-Dogmatism, and arguing that Skepticism and Skeptical-Dogmatism share some common benefits.
Q2

Bias, Knowledge, Skepticism, and Disagreement: Précis of Part iii of Bias: A Philosophical Study
Kelly T.
Abstract
The third and final part of Bias: A Philosophical Study explores the connections between bias and some of the central topics of epistemology, including knowledge, skepticism, and disagreement. It defends the possibility of biased knowing: biased believers can sometimes know, even when they believe in accordance with their biases, and even if those biases guarantee that they would believe as they do even if the truth were otherwise. It argues that the possibility of biased knowing has significant implications for both philosophical methodology and traditional forms of skepticism. Extended consideration is given to the question of whether those of us who robustly favor our ordinary commonsense views over the possibilities that the skeptic calls to our attention are biased against skepticism in any objectionable sense. Finally, it critically examines our tendency to attribute bias to others in response to interpersonal disagreement and the epistemological significance of “the bias blind spot.”
Q2

Bias Defended
Kelly T.
Abstract
In this paper, I clarify and defend some of the central ideas of Bias in response to commentators, with a special focus on the theme of skepticism. In response to Michael Veber, I defend the project of offering a modest as opposed to an ambitious response to the skeptic. In response to Jonathan Matheson, I defend my account of the way in which bias attributions function in contexts of interpersonal disagreement, as well as the claim that an unbiased believer will generally be in a stronger position to resist skeptical pressure from disagreement than a biased believer. In response to Brett Sherman, I clarify the way in which my account of bias accommodates the phenomenon of biased suspension of judgment, and I explore some of the connections between bias, suspension of judgment, and skepticism. In response to Jared Celinker and Nathan Ballantyne, I defend the possibility of emergent biases.
Q2

Psychological Reflections in the Philosopher’s Mirror: Comments on Thomas Kelly’s Bias: A Philosophical Study
Celniker J.B., Ballantyne N.
Abstract
In this brief commentary, we offer thoughts on Thomas Kelly’s Bias: A Philosophical Study. We focus on the book’s relevance to the study of cognitive biases, including Kelly’s discussion of naïve realism (in the psychologists’ sense). While we are largely enthusiastic about Kelly’s theorizing, we also provide some pushback against his notion of emergent biases. We hope that psychologists will engage with Kelly’s work and might consider how some philosophical refinements could improve the empirical study of biases.
Q2

Remarks on Ángel Pinillos’ Treatment of Global Skepticism in Why We Doubt
Walker M.
Abstract
Ángel Pinillos’ Why We Doubt offers an error theory for at least some versions of global skepticism: skeptical doubts are based on a faulty heuristic. Once this heuristic is replaced by a more apt principle inspired by Bayesian approaches to epistemology, the skeptical doubts are shown not to be motivated. I argue contra Pinillos that skeptical doubts may remain even if we grant the main line of Pinillos’ argument. Skeptical doubts might be generated by disagreement even when we accept Pinillos’ Bayesian inspired principle.
Q2

Navigating Skepticism: Cognitive Insights and Bayesian Rationality in Pinillos’ Why We Doubt
Gonnerman C., Waterman J.P.
Abstract
Pinillos’ Why We Doubt presents a powerful critique of such global skeptical assertions as “I don’t know I am not a brain-in-a-vat (biv)” by introducing a cognitive mechanism that is sensitive to error possibilities and a Bayesian rule of rationality that this mechanism is designed to approximate. This multifaceted argument offers a novel counter to global skepticism, contending that our basis for believing such premises is underminable. In this work, we engage with Pinillos’ adoption of Bayesianism, questioning whether the Bayesian principle that he invokes truly does fail to generate the verdict that we don’t we aren’t biv s, contrary to what Pinillos asserts. Furthermore, we argue that Pinillos’ empirical argument is not empirical enough; we need a lot more empirical work if we are going to counter global skepticism and win over neutral bystanders.
Q2

Biased Suspension of Judgment
Sherman B.
Abstract
According to Thomas Kelly, traditional skeptical arguments can be conceived in terms of bias. The main aim of this paper is not to challenge Kelly’s conclusions, but rather to draw some interesting consequences from them. Specifically, in addition to cases of biased judgments, which draw the ire of the skeptic, there are also cases of biased suspension of judgment. By examining cases of racially biased suspension of judgment and comparing them to cases of skepticism, I argue that we can help to uncover the mechanism that underlies the skeptic’s accusation of bias. In particular, I aim to show that it is the conclusiveness of one’s evidence, rather than the likelihood of the possibility at issue, that matters to the skeptic.
Q2

The Curious Case of the Disappearance of Pyrrhonism from Continental Philosophy
Dunphy R.
Abstract
In this article, evidence is briefly presented for three facts that together point to something puzzling. (1) That major continental philosophers of the nineteenth century tended to engage in some detail, as part of a broader preoccupation with ancient Greek thought, with Pyrrhonian scepticism. (2) That major continental philosophers of the twentieth century tended to engage in some depth with their nineteenth-century forebears and maintained their tendency to engage significantly with ancient Greek thought. (3) That twentieth-century continental philosophers demonstrate little to no interest in Pyrrhonian scepticism. This raises the question: why does engagement with Pyrrhonism disappear from continental philosophy? The article discusses two hypotheses that might explain this disappearance.
Top-100
Citing journals
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
|
Shokuhin eiseigaku zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan
1794 citations, 13.71%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography A
418 citations, 3.19%
|
|
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
208 citations, 1.59%
|
|
Food and Chemical Toxicology
200 citations, 1.53%
|
|
Food Chemistry
196 citations, 1.5%
|
|
Food Additives & Contaminants
190 citations, 1.45%
|
|
Food Additives and Contaminants - Part A Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment
183 citations, 1.4%
|
|
Chemosphere
159 citations, 1.22%
|
|
Toxicon
130 citations, 0.99%
|
|
Food Control
121 citations, 0.92%
|
|
EFSA Journal
110 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Analytica Chimica Acta
110 citations, 0.84%
|
|
Journal of Food Protection
109 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Toxins
108 citations, 0.83%
|
|
Journal of Food Science
107 citations, 0.82%
|
|
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
88 citations, 0.67%
|
|
International Journal of Food Microbiology
87 citations, 0.66%
|
|
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCE
85 citations, 0.65%
|
|
European Food Research and Technology
83 citations, 0.63%
|
|
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
74 citations, 0.57%
|
|
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
71 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
71 citations, 0.54%
|
|
Analytical Sciences
70 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
69 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies
69 citations, 0.53%
|
|
Bunseki Kagaku
67 citations, 0.51%
|
|
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
59 citations, 0.45%
|
|
Marine Drugs
58 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
57 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Journal of Pesticide Sciences
55 citations, 0.42%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
53 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications
53 citations, 0.41%
|
|
Talanta
52 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry
51 citations, 0.39%
|
|
JSM Mycotoxins
51 citations, 0.39%
|
|
Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi
50 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Journal of Separation Science
50 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Food Analytical Methods
49 citations, 0.37%
|
|
Foods
46 citations, 0.35%
|
|
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
45 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Yakugaku Zasshi
45 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Food Science and Technology Research
44 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Analytical Letters
44 citations, 0.34%
|
|
Science of the Total Environment
42 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
42 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
42 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Food and Cosmetics Toxicology
42 citations, 0.32%
|
|
Harmful Algae
41 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Chromatographia
40 citations, 0.31%
|
|
Molecules
39 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Biocontrol Science
39 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Journal of Chromatography Library
39 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
37 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Toxicology
37 citations, 0.28%
|
|
Analytical Methods
35 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Food Research International
35 citations, 0.27%
|
|
Fisheries Science
34 citations, 0.26%
|
|
Marine Pollution Bulletin
33 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
33 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Journal of Natural Medicines
32 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Food Additives and Contaminants: Part B Surveillance
32 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Environmental Science & Technology
32 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Journal of Liquid Chromatography
32 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Nutrients
31 citations, 0.24%
|
|
Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry
30 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
30 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Journal of Food Safety
29 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Food Safety
29 citations, 0.22%
|
|
International Journal of Food Science and Technology
28 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Journal of Dairy Science
28 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry
28 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Mycotoxin Research
27 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Mycopathologia
27 citations, 0.21%
|
|
LWT - Food Science and Technology
27 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Analytical Chemistry
27 citations, 0.21%
|
|
PLoS ONE
27 citations, 0.21%
|
|
Aquaculture
26 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Archives of Toxicology
26 citations, 0.2%
|
|
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
25 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Phytochemical Analysis
25 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
25 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of the American College of Toxicology
25 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
24 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Scientific Reports
24 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
24 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Hazardous Materials
24 citations, 0.18%
|
|
International Journal of Toxicology
23 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Forensic Science International
23 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Journal of Applied Bacteriology
23 citations, 0.18%
|
|
C R C Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
23 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Toxicology Letters
22 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Food Microbiology
22 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Journal of Applied Microbiology
22 citations, 0.17%
|
|
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
22 citations, 0.17%
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry
21 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
21 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Food Reviews International
21 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
21 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes
21 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Nahrung/Food
21 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
|
Citing publishers
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
|
Elsevier
3459 citations, 26.43%
|
|
Wiley
1239 citations, 9.47%
|
|
Springer Nature
1173 citations, 8.96%
|
|
Taylor & Francis
1168 citations, 8.93%
|
|
Japanese Society for Food Hygiene and Safety
1015 citations, 7.76%
|
|
780 citations, 5.96%
|
|
MDPI
464 citations, 3.55%
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
354 citations, 2.71%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
216 citations, 1.65%
|
|
Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
138 citations, 1.05%
|
|
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
126 citations, 0.96%
|
|
International Association for Food Protection
108 citations, 0.83%
|
|
SAGE
105 citations, 0.8%
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
61 citations, 0.47%
|
|
Oxford University Press
57 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Environmental Health Perspectives
57 citations, 0.44%
|
|
Japanese Association of Mycotoxicology
52 citations, 0.4%
|
|
Japanese Society of Fisheries Science
50 citations, 0.38%
|
|
Japanese Society for Food Science and Technology
46 citations, 0.35%
|
|
IOP Publishing
43 citations, 0.33%
|
|
Pesticide Science Society of Japan
41 citations, 0.31%
|
|
American Society for Microbiology
39 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Society for Antibacterial and Antifungal Agents
39 citations, 0.3%
|
|
Hindawi Limited
36 citations, 0.28%
|
|
S. Karger AG
33 citations, 0.25%
|
|
Cambridge University Press
30 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Food Safety Commission, Cabinet Office
30 citations, 0.23%
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
29 citations, 0.22%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
25 citations, 0.19%
|
|
Japanese Society of Toxicology
23 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Scientific Research Publishing
23 citations, 0.18%
|
|
Center for Academic Publications Japan
21 citations, 0.16%
|
|
Walter de Gruyter
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Microbiology Research Foundation
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
19 citations, 0.15%
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
17 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Pleiades Publishing
17 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Akademiai Kiado
17 citations, 0.13%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Science and Technology
16 citations, 0.12%
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
15 citations, 0.11%
|
|
15 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Wageningen Academic Publishers
15 citations, 0.11%
|
|
American Society for Nutrition
15 citations, 0.11%
|
|
14 citations, 0.11%
|
|
Japanese Society of Food Microbiology
13 citations, 0.1%
|
|
American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
12 citations, 0.09%
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
12 citations, 0.09%
|
|
The Japanese Association for the Integrated Study of Dietary Habits
12 citations, 0.09%
|
|
EDP Sciences
11 citations, 0.08%
|
|
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
11 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Iron and Steel Institute of Japan
11 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Science Alert
11 citations, 0.08%
|
|
AOAC International
10 citations, 0.08%
|
|
Microbiology Society
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Ministry of Agriculture
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Japanese Society of Nutrition and Dietetics
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
The Society for Chromatographic Sciences
9 citations, 0.07%
|
|
Trans Tech Publications
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Society of Chemical Engineers, Japan
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Japan Oil Chemists' Society
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Pharmaceutical Society of Korea
8 citations, 0.06%
|
|
Spandidos Publications
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
National Shellfisheries Association, Inc.
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Mass Spectrometry Society of Japan
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Japanese Society of Applied Glycoscience
7 citations, 0.05%
|
|
AIP Publishing
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Tong Kwahak Hoe
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society of Food Preservation
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Canadian Science Publishing
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
The Chemical Society of Japan
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Japan Veterinary Medical Association
6 citations, 0.05%
|
|
Emerald
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
King Saud University
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Royal Society
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society for Horticultural Science
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
American Society of Brewing Chemists
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Korea Ocean Research & Development Institute and Korean Society of Oceanography
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
The Electrochemical Society
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japanese Society for Complementary & Alternative Medicine
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
SciELO
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Japan Radioisotope Association
5 citations, 0.04%
|
|
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Japanese Society for Hygiene
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
China Science Publishing & Media
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Academic Journals
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Annual Reviews
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
CSIRO Publishing
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Publications Office of the European Union
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Baishideng Publishing Group
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Brewing Society of Japan
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Electronics, Information and Communications Engineers (IEICE)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan (IEE Japan)
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Society of Indoor Environment Japan
4 citations, 0.03%
|
|
Show all (70 more) | |
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
|
Publishing organizations
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
|
National Institute of Health Sciences
71 publications, 1.66%
|
|
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health
45 publications, 1.05%
|
|
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology
6 publications, 0.14%
|
|
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
University of Shizuoka
5 publications, 0.12%
|
|
Tokai University
3 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Mukogawa Women's University
3 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Hoshi University
3 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Tokyo Kasei University
3 publications, 0.07%
|
|
Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
University of Tokyo
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Nagasaki University
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Ehime University
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Azabu University
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Toyohashi University of Technology
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Teikyo University of Science
2 publications, 0.05%
|
|
Tokyo University of Agriculture
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Rural Development Administration
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Kyoto University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Nihon University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Nagoya City University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Chubu University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
University of Toyama
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Meiji Pharmaceutical University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Mie University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
International University of Health and Welfare
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Iwate Medical University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Toyama Prefectural University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
The Institute of Statistical Mathematics
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Showa Pharmaceutical University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Teikyo Heisei University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Kagawa Nutrition University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Daito Bunka University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Nihon Pharmaceutical University
1 publication, 0.02%
|
|
Show all (6 more) | |
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
|
Publishing organizations in 5 years
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
|
National Institute of Health Sciences
8 publications, 4.71%
|
|
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health
8 publications, 4.71%
|
|
Teikyo University of Science
2 publications, 1.18%
|
|
Tokai University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
University of Tokyo
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Ehime University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Mie University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Mukogawa Women's University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
Teikyo Heisei University
1 publication, 0.59%
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
|
Publishing countries
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
|
Japan
|
Japan, 734, 17.19%
Japan
734 publications, 17.19%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 2, 0.05%
Italy
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Republic of Korea
|
Republic of Korea, 2, 0.05%
Republic of Korea
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Saudi Arabia
|
Saudi Arabia, 2, 0.05%
Saudi Arabia
2 publications, 0.05%
|
Russia
|
Russia, 1, 0.02%
Russia
1 publication, 0.02%
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
|
Publishing countries in 5 years
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
|
Japan
|
Japan, 92, 54.12%
Japan
92 publications, 54.12%
|
Italy
|
Italy, 1, 0.59%
Italy
1 publication, 0.59%
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
|
1 profile journal article
Watanabe Satoru

Tokyo University of Agriculture
98 publications,
1 831 citations
h-index: 25
1 profile journal article
Yoshinari Kouichi
65 publications,
697 citations
h-index: 15